The Code of Hammurabi can tell us much about ancient Babylonian society, but cannot show us everything. The law code was written for the audience of Babylonian people in its own day, especially the scribes and officers of the law. So there are many questions we would have from a distance much later in history that people then would have understood without needing explanation. The intention of the law code was to inform people of laws and punishments, not to give later generations a full view of the whole of Babylonian life. The law code was prepared by those in power in the government of Hammurabi -- we don't get any response from the people or indication of how the people then viewed the laws. And ultimately, the law code is written in a detached, impersonal way -- as legal documents generally are written. We don't get a feel for the personal lives or feelings of people living at that time in Babylonia.
It sadly had ended in violence///:
At least 34 were noted as killed, while the leader Eugene V. Debs had gotten arrested. It was a big mess, and it was all because the federal troops had gotten involved.
I hope all is well, and you pass! Good luck, rockstar!
Answer choices are:
A. Globalization exploits poor people.
B. Globalization hinders prosperity.
C. Globalization limits free trade.
D. Globalization slows economic development.
Correct answer choice is:
A. Globalization exploits poor people.
Explanation:
Globalization is sort of a targeted aircraft. It'll hunt down with great exactness the poorest, most needy folks on the world. However, rather than killing them, it'll provide them jobs. If you were to style a program for eliminating impoverishment, you may hardly do higher than an enormous, self-sufficing, profitable system whereby the poorest folks within the world are given jobs.
The policy about the continuation of slavery does Lincoln supported was the policy of its founders to prohibit the spread of slavery into New Territories of USA because he had no doubt that the slavery will become extinct.
According to the fragment of Abraham Lincoln's speech, it can be affirmed that he was in favor of slavery in a restricted way in the territories where they already existed without allowing its expansion to the new territories, saying:
<em>"ALL I HAVE REQUESTED OR WANTED ANYWHERE IS TO BE REPLACED ON THE BASIS ON WHICH THE PARENTS OF OUR GOVERNMENT ORIGINALLY PLACED IT"</em>
On the other hand, he agreed with this proposal because he did not have doubt that it would be the way to radicate slavery by limiting it to those territories where already existed, because it was going to gradually fade, saying
<em>"I have no doubt that it would be extinguished, forever, if we went back to adopting the parenting policy."</em>
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/20903815
