It reintroduced the two-party system.
Answer:
Britain's goal with the Dominion of New England was to conglomerate all the governance of the colonies under one governor, a governor that would be able to properly enforce British laws. Before the Dominion was created, New England colonies were ruled under individual charters that allowed for self-government.
Explanation:
The idea that the best defense against terrorism in the world was to use American power to spread democratic values in countries that were potential breeding grounds for terrorist activity.
This sort of policy agenda was part of the "neoconservative" view of a number of President George W. Bush's advisers -- especially some who had also served in the administration of his father, President George H.W. Bush. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, there was a desire to push American values and not be shy about doing so with the use of American military might. Sometimes referred to as the "Bush Doctrine," the core ideas were that the United States could pursue this goals on its own (without need for United Nations partnerships), that preemptive strikes were allowable against countries that harbored terrorists, and that regime change for the sake of promoting democracy was a good strategy.
Things in Iraq haven't worked out as favorably as the Bush administration had hoped.
I think the correct answer for this would be C. Attacking slaves makes little to no sense, nor does political leaders, as that was late in the war. The first option would entail that the north never changed tactics. Monuments makes sense because they were a symbol of the confederate message and lifestyle. Attacking those sends a message that the Confederate States of America were coming to an end.
The statement that explains the rise of number of U.S troops in Vietnam during the 1960s "<span>President Johnson worried that a small presence in Vietnam would encourage Soviet aggression in the region."</span>