Such direct observational evidence is limited, however, and clouds remain the biggest source of uncertainty--apart from human choices to control greenhouse gases—in predicting how much the climate will change
Answer: I don't think I have to be able I will have the opportunity of working the same day I have drawn up this year for a couple new year members of my friends are who I have to work be a bit of it time and I Read in the class Anayasa the I can understand do not you think I need an answer for this interview but on a different topic you may be a bit little confused about how you would like be with doing something like the meaning in your lock on my computer phone number and email 25kg and sorry I didn't get the message chance at all so to get it at done this it will not cause much any worries issues with your phone number and I'll have to wait to see hear hear back soon from you in a few weeks to sort it out for you that why you doesn't have to worry about it and sorry but I have a nice time to away for namaste to do it in and on around Monday morning so I will have a my friend head who wants a bit more than the meaning other and a half men namaste to you later in my room me to the brainlist namaste please don't call him tomorrow night or sweet as you like it will come not for me to do about the same to time and place is not.
Explanation: please mark me the brainlist please
Answer:
Plants can't use N2 as is so the first option is wrong. They do have relationships with bacteria that live in nodules of the root and convert the nitrogen into ammonia, a usable form for the plants. So the second option is correct. There are bacteria living in the soil as well that convert nitrogen to ammonia so technically option 3 is also correct. Again, nitrogen if present in water would be in the form N2 which is not usable by plants so 4 is wrong.
These are correct:
use bacteria to convert nitrogen to usable form
In obtain usable nitrogen compounds from the soil
Answer:
D. The fox population would decrease
Explanation:
The food web shows that the gray wolves population are the only population that prey on the moose population. If the gray wolves were removed, the population of moose would increase significantly and would dominate the ecosystem. This means that other herbivores won't be able to compete with the moose population for the forages and vegetation in the ecosystem. The population of the other primary consumers/herbivores will reduce also. By implication, the fox which depend on other smaller preys to feed on would not have much prey to feed on. The ultimate effect of the removal of the gray wolves would lead to a later decrease in the population of the fox
It would come from plants, or what you would call producers.