1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andreyy89
3 years ago
14

All defendants in criminal trials are granted the right to a presumption of innocence true or false

Law
1 answer:
777dan777 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: True

Explanation:

Every defendant has the right proof his or her innocence in the court of law supported by necessary evidences, and witnesses. The court of law is also designated to provide defendant own lawyer when the person is not able to hire one. No defendant can give false statement against oneself. Until all facts related to the case are not clear and they do not go against the defendant till then the defendant is innocent in the court of law.

You might be interested in
If I were to barely touch some one and they push me down how do there parents get to press charges?
Ivanshal [37]
At that point I will beat em up
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is what?
enot [183]

Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is loss in inventory or land and profit calculation.

<u>Explanation: </u>

An employer or a businessman can claim indemnity or insurance in case his employee commits property theft under the Employee theft coverage. This coverage can help for indemnifying the loss of property, money or securities as result of theft by the employee.

However, inventory shortages are not covered under this cover if the only proof available is profit and loss calculation. But if there is other proof like video of the theft, etc. then such loss can also be covered under this insurance scheme.

4 0
3 years ago
A paragraph discussing which pieces of evidence, if any, could have class
NemiM [27]

Answer:

Evidence

Explanation:

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.Alternatively, blood recovered from a crime scene that tests show is type B (a class characteristic) could have come from any of the tens of millions of people who share this blood type. If the suspect has type B blood, he remains a suspect. From there, DNA (an individual characteristic) from the suspect and DNA from the blood evidence are tested to determine conclusively whether they match. If, however, the suspect’s blood is type A, he then is excluded as the source of the blood

7 0
3 years ago
Why Miranda is considered one of the most important cases in the history of our legal system
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
If you witnessed a crime scene but the police don't believe you what should you tell them?
pochemuha

Answer:

Explanation:

just try your best to answer their questions and state some things that you saw.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Discuss why you think police officers and/or their supervisors may be skeptical of researchers asking questions in and around th
    14·1 answer
  • Full faith and credit clause definition government
    14·1 answer
  • A garden table And a Bench 910 combined The garden table cost 60 more than the bench
    5·1 answer
  • This was a law created in 1887 to regulate railroads to ensure fair rates
    6·1 answer
  • Another round of bullets hits my skin
    14·2 answers
  • Explain and describe what the MAO-A gene is.
    9·1 answer
  • Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Cou
    15·1 answer
  • Help me answer all of these i’ll give brainlist !
    12·1 answer
  • The common law of Europe in the dark ages was developed by custom and usage,
    12·1 answer
  • What factors influence the supreme court’s decision-making practices?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!