I believe if the are underange he may be forced unless certain situations things like joint custody might come into play. joint physical custody is where a court orders a child to spend a substantial amount of time with both parents during the course of the year. Second, joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters. Lastly, both joint physical and legal custody is a combination of the first two. IT IS ULTIMATELY up to the court to decide whether any type of joint custody is in the best interests of a child. If not, the parent with primary custodial rights over a child will get to decide what kind of visitation for the other parent is fair and reasonable. In many situations, this works out well for both parents and they can often come to an amicable arrangement regarding visitation hours and days.
The English Bill of Rights supported the following civil liberties for citizens:
- Defense against harsh penalty
- Possession of firearms
- The option of a jury trial Justification:
These three points support citizens with fair treatment and provide insurance for a decent standard of living. The first protects citizens from all forms of torture and mistreatment, the second permits gun ownership with the appropriate restrictions for regular citizens, and the third offers citizens with legal assistance if they are subjected to a procedure that must uphold all general rights.
In order to enshrine the rights of American citizens, the bill of rights was drafted. Additionally, it was done to prevent the government from encroaching on citizens' freedoms.
To know more about bill of rights: brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ4
Answer:
I believe the answer to 1. is B, and Grare decisis means substantially the same. Basically based on a court's previous decision in a case, that same decision can be carried out and used in any future cases.
Explanation:
