Answer:
1. allows the narrator to exaggerate
Explanation:
Authorial reticence is lack of clear conclusion or opinions about an event. It allows the narrator to exaggerate and escape the judgement. The readers does not prefer authorial reticence as there is absence of clear judgement. There author can include fantasies and magics which will end up readers concluding things their own way. It leaves readers in the state of uncertainty and clear conclusion is not given right way.
Answer:
His opinions and attitudes are totally worth considering.
Explanation:
Shakespeare was a literary genius who was highly educated and well ahead of his time. He was a brilliant author and playwright and his opinions are definitely worth considering.
Hope this helps!
