The adaption they use is literary adaption in which the authors in which they adapt a literary source to another genre.
For experience for there future
A. “Everyone knows at least one of those people who are willing to jeopardize their own health and well-being to help others.” (Paragraph 1)
B. “News stories often focus on grander cases of altruism, such as a man who dives
into an icy river to rescue a drowning stranger or a generous donor who gives thousands of dollars to a local charity.” (Paragraph 4)
C. “Prosocial behavior refers to any action that benefits other people, no matter what the motive or how the giver benefits from the action.” (Paragraph 5)
D. “Do we ever engage in helping others for truly altruistic reasons, or are there hidden benefits to ourselves that guide our altruistic behaviors?” (Paragraph 15)
“Do we ever engage in helping others for truly altruistic reasons, or are there hidden benefits to ourselves that guide our altruistic behaviors?” (Paragraph 15)
Option D.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The article altruism: why we risk our own well-being to help others talks about being good to other people and help them where ever and how ever possible.
Be an altruistic might reap the people benefits which they might have not even expected which would be a result of their being kind and helpful to the other people. But according to the passage, there are few chances of true altruistic being existent.
When you're arguing you want to make your point as objective as possible, for this you have to be impartial so that your proof is strong.
Comparing the opposite side's views to something unpleasant is useless since this kind of comparison holds no proof that your argument is true. <em>Incorrect</em>
If you include only general details the audience will understand, you might not be able to communicate the specific points of your argument, therefore you wouldn't be able to prove it is accurate. <em>Incorrect</em>
To make your argument effective you have to use specific details to refute the opposite side's views. That way you'll present the specific points in which your argument will stand, you will communicate logical and objective ideas about your argument and they will work to prove it. <u><em>Correct</em></u>
If you appeal to emotion, your argument will be subject to possible biases since the way a person or group feels towards something doesn't prove it right or wrong. <em>Incorrect</em>
Answer:
I think it's correct answer A. is
I hope it's helpful for you...
