1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
laila [671]
3 years ago
13

Mahal kita you translate

History
2 answers:
stepladder [879]3 years ago
8 0

Translation: I love you lolll

polet [3.4K]3 years ago
3 0

I LOVE YOU ?

Explanation:

hahaha salamat sa points

You might be interested in
Which of the following is Not a reason the industrial revolution started in europe
Mrac [35]
The Song Dynasty (900-1200 CE/AD) was technically the first to industrialize. They were the first known to have assembly lines and they had very advanced technology, but due to their Confucianist ideals they weren't as expansionist and imperialist as Europe which means they didnt spread this at all... so once they were defeated, so was this small burst of industrialism.
3 0
2 years ago
Who was the First woman in the Salem witch trial
Eduardwww [97]

Bridget Bishop was the first women in the Salem Witch Trial.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the significance of Edward Cartwright
sergij07 [2.7K]

He invented the power loom.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the main purpose of Dollar Diplomacy?
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

A? I believe its A.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The combination of nobles and knights created which group?
SIZIF [17.4K]
<span>Combining nobles and knights must have created the lords. It couldn't have created the royals because knights weren't always of royal blood. It certainly couldn't have created the peasants as they already existed at a much lower status than either Knights or nobles who would not have moved down in status through combining. I don't think it is vassals because vassals were landholders who owed allegiance but again not all knights owned land so that rules them out. That leaves the group called "lords". Lords are still in existence today and people are still "nobles" and are still knighted by royalty. So that makes "Lords" the most correct answer.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the world respond to Bosnian aggression
    8·2 answers
  • How did Spain try to establish its empire in the Americas?
    15·2 answers
  • Death Valley is an arid, low-lying area in (1 point) California. Arizona. New Mexico. South Carolina.
    5·2 answers
  • How did hitler manipulate the term aryan for nazi purposes?
    14·1 answer
  • Which one of the Bill of Rights says that other powers not specifically given to the federal government or specifically forbidde
    8·1 answer
  • Why were navy officials suspicious of farragut's loyalty?
    11·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone help me out?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is primarily controlled by individual states?
    8·2 answers
  • A native of San Antonio, he represented Texas' 20th District in the U.S. Congress
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!