1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pickupchik [31]
3 years ago
12

Which statement would an Anti-Federalist be most likely to agree with?

History
2 answers:
matrenka [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Most political power should rest with the states.

Explanation:

Verizon [17]3 years ago
5 0
Anti-Federalism refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government. Therefor, they most likely agree that the Constitution needs to be changed to include a bill of rights.





Here’s ur answer





Mark me as brainliest
You might be interested in
How did the crop rotation system that developed in britain during the agricultural revolution increase crop yields?
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

by increasing nutrients in the soil. which increased the number of farmers

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
The process of petrification
Anastaziya [24]

Explanation:

In geology, petrifaction or petrification is the process by which organic material becomes a fossil through the replacement of the original material and the filling of the original pore spaces with minerals.

3 0
3 years ago
Hellow =) ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,​
aksik [14]

Answer:

hi

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Witch statement best explains why the northern states most likley favored tariffs on foreign goods
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

are there choices that you have to pick from?

3 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The U.S Bill of Rights is based on enlightenment ideas of natural rights including
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these men was not a member of the Republican Party?
    7·1 answer
  • The purpose of a spinning jenny was to<br> i belive the C
    7·2 answers
  • What city state was Athens grates enemy and is the farthest south on the mainland
    11·1 answer
  • Someone please help due tomorrow at 8am :( really exhausted, I just need to get some sleep, I don’t even know the answers WILL G
    7·1 answer
  • Many Europeans left parts of Europe because of a lack of various freedoms. Once in the Americas, they soon began to import slave
    8·1 answer
  • So how did the telephone affect the world ?
    6·1 answer
  • What argument does Senator James Henry Hammond make?
    6·2 answers
  • Based on the information provided in this lesson, what steps can you take at fast food restaurants to minimize bad nutritional c
    15·1 answer
  • Between 1890 and 1910, the united states most strongly pursued a foreign policy promoting.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!