The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Hitler used propaganda, terror tactics, secret police (Gestapo), he outlawed other political parties, and made the army swear personal allegiance to him. <span>The Nazi-Soviet Pact was a 10 year Nonaggression pact that Germany signed with the Soviet Union in 1939 (which Hitler obviously broke a mere 2 years later). "</span>
Commodore Perry's arrival in Japan in 1853 resulted in factors that led to the collapse of the Tokugawa Shogunate. The anti-foreign sentiment was directed against the shogun as well as against foreigners in Japan. The Satsuma and Choshu clans united to bring down the shogun, and in 1867, they did so.
Asia. In the yearly survey held by the American based non- governmental Freedom House, the ratings showed that the continent that would least enjoy these liberties would be Asia. Africa was a close second to Asia.
