Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Dividend means that a company is how much a company pays of its profits to shareholders or investors.
Answer:
The maximum profit and loss for this position is $3 and -$7 respectively
Explanation:
The computations are shown below:
For maximum profit:
= Strike price at the sale - stock price + put price - call price
= $42 - $39 + $0.55 - $0.55
= $3
For maximum loss:
= Strike price at purchase - stock price + put price - call price
= $32 - $39 + $0.55 - $0.55
= -$7
Simply we take the difference between the strike price ,and the stock price and after that the put and call price are adjusted
The answer is exclusive distribution. This is exclusive when just certain retailers are given the alternative of conveying an item in its store. In this way, it is an understanding between a provider and a retailer giving the retailer elite rights inside a particular land region to convey the provider's item.
