Answer:
D is the answer I'm sure of it
The statement that actually explains best how the underlined clause conveys meaning is option C: It is a relative clause describing the qualities of the brownies.
<h3>What is a clause?</h3>
A clause actually refers to a group of words which actually consists of subject and verb. The verb and the subject are usually related. Also, the clause tells one about the subject or the action happening.
The options that complete the question are:
a. It is a noun clause stating what Sami likes about brownies.
b. It is an adverbial clause telling why Sami liked the brownies.
c. It is a relative clause describing the qualities of the brownies.
d. It is an independent clause explaining how brownies are m...
We can conclude that option C is the correct answer it conveys the correct meaning of the underlined clause.
Learn more about clause on brainly.com/question/13532976
#SPJ1
After reading the sentence carefully, we can identify the problem in it as being the following among the answer choices:
C. Shift in point of view.
- A shift in point of view occurs when we tell something from two different perspectives.
- For example, take a look at the sentence below:
<u>"I visited the museum because you can always relax at an art exhibition."</u>
- Although the sentence is not too confusing, it begins with one point of view, "I", and changes to another, "you".
- That is what happens in the sentence we are analyzing here.
- Who goes to a baseball game? The audience. But all of a sudden, the speaker is talking about the players.
- Of course, the players will be there. But they are not "going" to the game, they are playing it.
- Thus, there was shift from one perspective, "the audience", to another, "the players".
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/14889007
Answer:I believe the answer is B
Explanation:
Answer: An evaluation of the evidence
Explanation:
The thesis statement is essentially the main idea of a research or claim. It is usually short and concise such that it fits into a sentence. In this scenario that would be the author saying that everyone who is registered to vote should vote and those who are not registered should register.
There is also a concluding statement and a summary of the claim in the last paragraph.
What is missing however, is the evaluation of evidence. The claim did not present evidence as to why people should vote so evaluation is impossible.
