1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julsineya [31]
3 years ago
5

Which advantages did the British have over the colonists during the American war for independence?

History
1 answer:
Daniel [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I'm going with B

Explanation:

It can't be A because the war took place in America and that is not the Brits home turf and can't be C because the natives almost definitely didn't like the brits. I'm not sure on D but B seems more likely over that.

You might be interested in
Can someonw make this shorter???
laila [671]
Dr.Millon, learned about the oddities of personality first hand, the halls of AllenTown hospital after named to the hospitals board in 1950 as a part of overhaul effort in Pennsylvania. A young assistant at a nearby Lehigh University, he ventured incognito through the hospital. He wrote an essay in 2001 he dressed himself in hospital garb for over entire weekend periods conversing at length with patients housed in a acute and chronic wards.
4 0
3 years ago
What are some of the benefits of the articles of confederation
taurus [48]

The major downfall of the Articles of Confederation was simply weakness. The federal government, under the Articles, was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power. The Continental Congress had borrowed money to fight the Revolutionary War and could not repay their debts.

Hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
How did civilization grow in Mesopotamia?
Tomtit [17]

Answer:

Ancient Mesopotamia and the surrounding area is often called the Fertile Crescent or the Cradle of Civilization. The Tigris and Euphrates rivers supplied fresh water for humans, plants, and animals. ... Farmers in Mesopotamia grew barley, wheat, lentils, chickpeas, onions, garlic, dates, and lettuce.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What resulted from the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case?
Mashcka [7]

Answer: A. The abolitionist movement grew stronger.

<em>Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)</em> was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It held that black people whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., whether enslaved of free, could not be American citizens. Therefore, they could not sue in federal court. Moreover, it ruled that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States.

The decision was controversial, and greatly opposed by abolitionist groups. It strengthened the abolitionist movement and may have been a catalyst for the American Civil War.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following did NOT contribute to the fall of the Roman Empire?
Leviafan [203]
I would say  d.  division of the empire into 2 halves.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the magna carta gradually change legal ideas in england
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be against the Constitution?
    8·1 answer
  • Define: Separations of Powers
    6·2 answers
  • Label these water areas on the map and shade them blue
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the tactics of senator Joseph McCarthy including the statement above and explain why few Challenge him??
    8·1 answer
  • How did immigration begin to change in the 1890s
    7·2 answers
  • What were the results of the air war and the Battle of the Atlantic?
    11·2 answers
  • "Fellow-Citizens:
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Zhou Dynasty influence China? <br> MARKING BRAINLIEST!!
    12·2 answers
  • Which feature completes the Venn diagram?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!