<u>Answer:</u>
A) The character’s effect on others
B) The character's actions
C) The character's thoughts
These are all the methods of indirect characterization.
Hence, the correct answer is option (D) All of these.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Characterization is a process by which the author develops a character and creates his image for the audience. This can be done by: direct characterization or indirect characterization.
In Direct Characterization, author tells the personality of the character to the audience. For Example: “A shy boy and a pretty girl were standing in the queue”. This tells directly the personality of boy and girl as shy and pretty, respectively.
Indirect characterization is the way by which the writer depicts the character's personality through speech, actions and appearance. Like, how the character is reacting in a situation or what his actions are. So, the correct option is Option D: All of these.
Soaring
......................................
Answer:
Chicago Bulls
Explanation:
Based on the passage, the Chicago Bulls won the match because of several reasons.
First, the excerpt says "...should HAVE BEEN the game the Chicago Bulls lost" because their star player Michael Jordan was hospitalised because of a suspected stomach flu and he was dehydrated and missed two days of practice meaning that because of the fact that the Chicago Bulls did not have their star man operating optimally, they were supposed to lose.
The next line goes ahead to say that, "It SHOULD (in fact) HAVE marked the Utah's Jazz's first NBA Championship
win" meaning that because of the advantage of Chicago Bulls not having their star player at a hundred percent, Utah Jazz were slight favorites to win and should have in fact won, but apparently they didn't.
Finally, the tenses used in the passage indicate strongly that Utah Jazz failed to capitalise on the slight advantage they had and Chicago Bulls won the game.
Answer:
For one, the woman in her story is a domineering wife, who openly admits to keeping her husband under her thumb. The Wife of Bath seems to be a very confident and forceful individual, as shown by her willingness to push around and mock the people in the party (another thing uncommon of women in that time period).
Explanation:
For one, the woman in her story is a domineering wife, who openly admits to keeping her husband under her thumb. The Wife of Bath seems to be a very confident and forceful individual, as shown by her willingness to push around and mock the people in the party (another thing uncommon of women in that time period).
