Secretary of State Marshall suggested his plan to help rebuild European economies after World War as a way of staving off political instability and poverty conditions, which would become breeding grounds for governments that would go against freedom.
Explanation/context:
The "Marshall Plan" was named after the man who then was US Secretary of State, George C. Marshall. Officially the plan was called the European Recovery Program. Marshall announced the plan in 1947, and it went into effect in 1948. The intent was to provide aid and rebuilding to European economies after the damaging effects of World War II.
In his speech introducing the plan, Secretary Marshall presented the plan as aid for any and all nations, saying : "Our policy is not directed against any country, but against hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos. Any government that is willing to assist in recovery will find full co-operation on the part of the United States. Its purpose should be the revival of a working economy in the world so as to permit the emergence of political and social conditions in which free institutions can exist." <em>[I provided more context for the quote you had shown, to see more of his intent in the remarks.]</em>
The view in the communist-controlled Eastern bloc was that the US was trying to use such a policy to spread its influence and threaten their patterns of government under communism. So the plan ended up building allies for the US in Western Europe, while the Eastern European countries sided with the Soviet Union. So it was an example of Cold War tactics of competition between the US and the USSR, apart from the use of military force.
The answer to the question what prompted the united states to send supplies to israel during the Yowm Kippur War is letter B. The united states was prompted by the Soviet Union in Syria that came to support them. So that is the reason why the united states actually send supplies to Israel that time.
It would potentially be unethical for a criminologist to observe a teenage gang and engage in similar behavior with them because this individual would essentially be condoning their criminal behavior. This is potentially seen as unethical and blurring the lines between "observation" and taking part in the activities of the population being studied.
Settlers were constantly taking more land than either they agreed for, or just what didnt belong to them, the Indians would fight back and lose in the end, they would shrink back and find more land, there would be peace for a little while, and then settlers would keep wanting more land
1. To guide the disciples on the road to Emmaus from doubt to faith, Jesus <u>broke the </u><u>bread</u><u> after giving </u><u>thanks</u>.
2. In Acts 17:10-34, Paul reasoned with the Athenian philosophers that they had been worshipping the Almighty God (the unknown God) without actually realizing it.
<h3>What was the story of Jesus and the Emmaus disciples?</h3>
The story of Jesus and the disciples on the road to Emmaus showed that Jesus Christ after his resurrection continued to teach his disciples to grow and strengthen their faith.
However, we understand that reading and studying the Scriptures is not enough for faith to flourish. Jesus used the breaking of bread to open the spiritual eyes of the disciples that he has risen indeed.
<h3>What happened in the Areopagus?</h3>
According to Acts 17: 10-34, Paul showed the Men of Athens that they built an altar dedicated to the unknown God.
It was the same unknown God that Paul came to Athens to reveal to the Athenians.
Thus, Jesus Christ used an object (bread) to clear the doubts of the disciples on the road to Emmaus, just as Paul used the altar dedicated to the unknown God to show the Athenians that they had known and worshipped the God he proclaimed.
Learn more about the Gospel of Jesus Christ at brainly.com/question/1553529
#SPJ1
