The Mason-Dixon Line<span> is the boundary between the states of </span>Maryland<span> and </span>Pennsylvania, but it came to represent more than that. It <span>designate the boundary between the northern "free" states and the southern "slave" states in </span>Civil War<span> times. </span>Charles Mason<span> and </span>Jeremiah Dixon<span> set out in 1765 to survey the land and settle a dispute </span>about land grants between Pennsylvania's Penn<span> family and Maryland's </span>Baltimores. The term Mason-Dixon Line was first used in congressional debates leading to the 1820 Missouri Compromise, which determined where slavery would be allowed as the United States expanded.<span>
</span>
The correct answer is D. NATO and the Warsaw Pact were two competing alliances during the Cold War. <span>Cold War was a state of political and military tension between powers in the Western Bloc (US and its NATO allies) and Eastern Bloc (the Soviet Union and its allies in the Warsaw pact). The term "cold" is used because there were no direct conflict between the two superpowers. It is usually considered that the Cold War begun in 1947 and ended in 1991, with the fall of the Soviet Union and many other communistic regimes. </span>
In ancient Mesopotamia, the Tigris and Euphrates river provided sources of life in an otherwise desolate area of the world. The people would use the tough reeds to build many things, ranging from boats to houses. (Humans used reeds to build structures and boats and such.
Answer:
Slavery was against Mexican law, but Americans brought slaves to Texas. Many American settlers and Tejanos, or Mexicans who lived in Texas, wanted to break away from Mexico. They did not like laws made by Santa Anna, Mexico's president. ... After this, Texans declared independence and formed the Republic of Texas.
Explanation:
1) it is persuasive because it talks about the positives of joining the league. We can use it to our advantage by what the league can influence.
2) it is persuasive because it used an scare tactic to to warn us that without the league, the world will fail. We can use this to advantage by knowing the concerns and what would happen if we don’t have support from the league
3) this arguement is persuasive because it tells us what it will allow. We can use it to our advantage by bringing “peace throughout the world”
This is what I would put tbh you’d make around probably an 80
