If the possible answers are:
<span>a. The events in Rwanda show that genocide can still happen, despite the impact of the Holocaust.
b. The events in Rwanda show that genocide has stopped because of the effects of the Holocaust.
c. The events in Rwanda show that the international community has forgotten the impact of the Holocaust.
d. The events in Rwanda show that the international community no longer cares about the effects of the Holocaust.
Then the correct answer is </span>a. The events in Rwanda show that genocide can still happen, despite the impact of the Holocaust.
The genocide in Rwanda happened after the holocaust and shows that no matter how hard the community tries, such monstrosities can still happen. The genocide in Rwanda was based around the similar principle as that in Germany. There was a group who perceived that their ethnicity was higher than that of another ethnicity and tried to eliminate them completely.
I believe that the subject was the American colonies
Answer:
The information in the question is correct.
Internet access in Africa is on average, much lower than in Europe, and the rest of the world.
In some African countries like Eritrea, Burundi and Somalia, less than 2% of the total population have access to the internet, while Iceland, an European country, has an internet coverage of 100% of its population.
This low internet penetration in Africa is related to other socioeconomic variables such as lower per capita incomes, lower economic development, and higher social conflictivity.
IDK I tried
Britain wanted to become less involved in the government of their colonies because it was very time-consuming and expensive. It was time for the colonies to become more independent.
