<u>True.</u> By the time the British colonized islands in the west indies, the indigenous populations had all but died out.
<h3><u>British colonized islands – what are they?</u></h3>
Anguilla, the Cayman Islands, the Turks, and Caicos Islands, Montserrat, the Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Dominica, Grenada, Jamaica, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, British Guiana (now Guyana), and Trinidad and Tobago were all British territories in the West Indies.
The former British Honduras and Bermuda are two additional territories (now Belize). The phrase was used to refer to all British colonies in the region until the British Empire was decolonized in the late 1950s and early 1960s. The phrase "Commonwealth Caribbean" is now used after the majority of the territories gained their independence from the United Kingdom.
Learn more about British colonization with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/12214401
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is C or A
Because of the highly subjective questions asked by early philosophers, the scientific community <em>C. </em><em>Took</em><em> a </em><em>skeptical view </em><em>of the emerging field of </em><em>Psychology</em><em>. </em>
Scientific theory is based on objective research which has to be proven by multiple people before it is considered factual. As a result, when the early psychologists arose, scientists were skeptical.
This is why they did not readily accept:
- Wilhelm Wundt with his empirical psychology
- Ivan Pavlov with classical conditioning
- Sigmund Freud with psychoanalysis and,
- B. F. Skinner with behaviorism
As time went by however and a lot of what early psychologists said were proven or improved on, psychology came to be regarded as a science.
In conclusion, psychology had a very rocky start because the scientific community had some doubts about it but it has since become a science that follows the scientific method to come up with theory that is acceptable.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14466706.</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
El Foro y la Mesa Redonda son muy similar pero tienen tambien una grande diferencia. El foro tambien donde se reunen para discutir diferentes asuntos y donde todos escuchando pueden intevenir en la discusion, incluyendo el auditorio. La Mesa redonda es mas para una cierta cantidad de sujetos que se reunen para desarollar un tema en especifico. En otras palabras la gran diferencia entre las dos son la cantidad de individuos que participan en la discussion.
