Answer:
The idealistic approach is more valuable in the long-term, because it not only offers solutions to present and future problems, but it also offers a vision: an idea about the future for a person, a corporation, a city, or a nation.
The practical approach is more valuable in the short-term. While long-term ideas and vision of the idealists can be fulfilled, there are many concrete problems that need to be solved in the meantime, and this is the time and place where practical people shine.
Here, according to the chart (you provided by the link), we can see week first typically has the highest attendance
In short, Your Answer would be Option D
Hope this helps!
The character of Editha is a foil, developed to portray the fickleness of the arguments that support war.
The author ironically reveals how Editha repeats the passages from newspapers and magazines supporting the need to go to war. But the author takes a step further to give us a view of Editha’s perception when she says, "But now it doesn't matter about the how or why. Since the war has come, all that is gone. There are no two sides any more. There is nothing now but our country."
Finally, toward the end of the story, Mrs. Gearson sarcastically says, "No, you didn't expect him to get killed," a commentary by the author to show the ignorance of people who idealize war.
The appropriate words to fill the gaps are:
1. had spoken
2. to take off
3. had lived
4. not to go
5. had just left
6. to check
7. had not eaten
8. would see
9. would like
10. to give
11. to stay back
12. will come back
13. was late
14. had to be
15. to open
16. everyone
17. without.
18. though
19. why
20. another
21. for
22. not a
23. who
24. same
Thus, the appropriate words have been used to fill the gaps.
Read more: brainly.com/question/24300300
