1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
egoroff_w [7]
3 years ago
15

Uranium-235 has a half-life of 700 million years. How many years will it take Uranium-235 to decay to 1/8 of its original mass?

Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
liraira [26]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: 2.1 billion years

Explanation:

The half-life of an element refers to the amount of time it would take for half of its mass to decay.

In 700 million years, Uranium - 235 will be 1/2 of its original mass.

If divided by 2, the 1/2 becomes 1/4 which is the proportion of the original mass the Uranium would get to after another 700 million years.

Dividing by another would get the Uranium-235 to 1/8 of its original value and would take another 700 million years.

Total time taken:

= 700 + 700 + 700

= 2,100 million years

= 2.1 billion years

You might be interested in
Which kinds of objects can become fossils
levacccp [35]
Animals (mostly bones) and trees

Hope this was what you were asking for :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the federal and state minimum wages are different the highest minimum wage is used
Galina-37 [17]
That statement is true
The purpose of minimum wages is to make sure that every worker in united states (who worked at least 40 days a week) have enough resource to at least sustain the living of their family. So in cases of contradictory occurrence like this, the highest minimum wage will be used over the lower ones
7 0
3 years ago
Chris Langan’s story illustrates that:
shtirl [24]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Because it sais it in it

4 0
3 years ago
radioactive decay of 40k in an igneous rock has resulted in a ratio of 25 percent 40k atoms to 75 percent of 40ar and 40ca atoms
kenny6666 [7]
They Are 40k btw your welcome
3 0
3 years ago
Why do scientists leave peanuts out of the true nut category?how do you know
castortr0y [4]

Answer:

Peanuts aren't actually a true nut

Explanation:

  1. <u> </u><u>they're a legume (in the same family as peas and lentils).</u>
  2. <u> For this reason, people who are allergic to peanuts can also be allergic to tree nuts, such as almonds, Brazil nuts, walnuts, hazelnuts, macadamia nuts, pistachios, pecans, and cashews.</u>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is dreaming important and how can that be applied towards animals?
    6·1 answer
  • How would you explain self-esteem to someone?
    6·1 answer
  • In the declaration of sentiments
    15·1 answer
  • A barrio is an example of
    6·1 answer
  • Briefly explain how the idea of U.S. territorial expansion relates to the views expressed in the text excerpt.
    9·1 answer
  • Which best describes the use of a literary device in line 4
    10·1 answer
  • Please help!!! if I get the right answer I will mark you the brainless!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • MARKING BRAINLIEST: QUESTION ABOUT DIALOGUE : Ok so i'm writing a memoir from the first time I smoked for my AP LANG class. I ju
    8·1 answer
  • Mataas ang antas ng Unemployment rate. SIGE NA GUYS I NEED TO PASS THIS NOWW!!
    8·1 answer
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of two-wheeled transportation?<br> edge2021
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!