Answer:
The loss of a lost one, especially one as meaningful as a husband, can be devastating and even harmful for anyone. What will make a difference on whether the person will be able to pull through, or not, are two things, two inner, two external: personal strength, given by a person´s personality qualities and belief system, and the second, the cultural and social bases that the person has, meaning, support networks, socialization, religious beliefs and family.
Given the case of Sylvia and Joanne, although both women have taken the death of their loved ones very hard, and given that we do not have any further information on them except that one has a belief system based on religion, and the other doesn´t, we can predict that Sylvia counts with two factors, mentioned above, that will help her heal much faster than Joanne, even if both women may find that relief at some point. Sylvia has the strength of inner belief boosted by religious beliefs, which provide columns on which she can lean to understand what happened, make sense of it, and thus heal. And two, she also will have access to a broader network of support, because religious groups tend to become some of the strongest networks for people.
Answer:
In the case presented above, Explanation makes it easier by community with epithet about the problem and what the next step is going to be
Economic problems exist in all society; it’s dealing with how to manage scares resources. Since man needs and wants is unlimited, the available resources to meet up with both the needs and want is limited. Economics problem appears very complex and many factors are responsible for it.
An economic problem basically is the problem of allocating resources. Some of the causes of economic problem are unlimited wants and limited resources.
Unlimited wants: human want is unending; soon as an individual is satisfied, new want surfaces. There are lots several wants an individual can’t do without such as food, shoe etc.
Limited resources: this is known as scarcity. It is when the production of goods and services are not meeting up with the demand.
People barely understand the root causes of economic hardship and for them to have a clearer picture of what the root causes are, a simple explanation will make it easier to identify the problem and the next step to be taken in order to solve it.
Economic issues should be communicated in a simpler form, so that the people can have a better understanding of the real issue at hand and how to tackle it.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
- causes of economic
- economic problems
- economic problem
- unlimited wants
- limited resources
Answer:
The Senate
Explanation:
A U.S. district judge pled guilty to obstruction of justice for lying to judges who investigated sexual misconduct complaints. Sentenced to 33 months in federal prison in May 2009, the judge attempted to retire from the bench, thereby allowing him to draw his salary. He was impeached and resigned from the bench in disgrace, effectively ending his impeachment trial. The Senate impeached the U.S. district judge.
U.S. District Judge Samuel B. Kent pleaded guilty in February 2009 to obstruction of justice for lying to a judicial committee investigating an allegation he sexually harassed an employee. Kent was sentenced today to 33 months for aggravated sexual abuse for his alleged assaults in 2003 and 2007
Answer:
I don't know what topic you want, but a good non-fiction book is The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank and a historical fiction one also about the holocaust is Yellow Star by Jennifer Roy
The answer is <u>"adjudication".</u>
Criminal justice is a procedure, including a progression of steps starting with a criminal examination and completion with the arrival of an indicted wrongdoer from restorative supervision. Standards and basic leadership are at the focal point of this procedure.
Trial/adjudication of guilt by a judge or jury, with an examiner and a barrier lawyer taking an interest. A preliminary is held under the watchful eye of a judge or jury. The standard of proof for a criminal conviction is blame past a sensible uncertainty—under 100 percent sureness yet more than high likelihood. On the off chance that there is question in light of reason, the charged is qualified for be vindicated.
