After the successful revolution in the Latin American countries, instead of democracies as the people wanted, the countries became mostly communist and dictatorships. While in some countries that communism was embraced by the people, and in the case of Cuba it worked out relatively well, it was not the case for most of the other countries. The other nations were stuck with dictators that tried to control every aspect of the country and society, and they did it in a very bad manner, usually using violence. That was not seen fondly by the people, so there were lot of conflicts, which eventually led to the overthrow of most of these leaders, and finally became democracies, at least on paper.
The answer is b hope this help let me know if its wrong good luck from michigan
The answer would be C
Explanation: “Since Roman Catholicism was the state religion for Spain and its colonies, Spain stipulated Catholicism as the state religion when Texas was opened to Anglo-American immigration in 1820.”
Answer:
Shays’ rebellion led Washington and other Nationalists in early independence America like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison to see that the Articles of Confederation were inadequate because they limited how the federal government could respond to uprisings like Shay's Rebellion. This led the Nationalists or Federalists as they are also known to ratify the constitution at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
Explanation:
Daniel Shays was a small landowner who fought in the Revolutionary War but was never paid. He returned home to find that he was being charged for debts while he was away fighting the war and he had no means to pay. There were many in his community of Springfield, MA in the same situation. Shays eventually became one of the leaders of the uprisings against the taxes the state of Massachusetts was trying to exact. The rebellion proved that the United States was vulnerable as a federal entity under the Articles of Confederation and led many figures like George Washington to advocate for strengthening the federal government vis-a-vis the states so as to prevent similar challenges in the future.
