1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksenya-84 [330]
2 years ago
13

PLEASE!!!

History
2 answers:
Stels [109]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

sleet_krkn [62]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Can someone give me a REAL answer pls:)
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.

Explanation:

In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.

Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.

3 0
3 years ago
Was Columbus really a conqueror? was he the bad guy? explain your reasoning 5 sentences​
Degger [83]

Answer:

1.Christopher Columbus was a fraud.2. He was indeed a brave and prolific explorer.  3.but he also was a brutal evil man who never even made it to the place that is now the United States.4. We all believe that Columbus is a villain than a hero.

5.First of all, according to Wikipedia, A hero (masculine) or heroine (feminine) is a person or main character of a literary work who, in the face of danger, combats adversity through feats of ingenuity, bravery or strength, often sacrificing their own personal concerns for a greater good. However, based on what we have learned about Christopher Columbus, what he did has nothing to do with the definition of hero. His motivation to take the travel was to arrive in India, a country in east Asia, to obtain gold. From this perspective, his motivation was not noble. In addition, he did not arrive in India.

Secondly, he set a bad example to colonists came later. According to the article “Christopher Columbus: Hero or Murderer?” by Whitney DeWitt, it is said that “Columbus’s arrogance and exploitation regarding slavery began on his second voyage. Ferdinand and Isabella had ordered that the natives be treated kindly. In opposition to this order, Columbus began exporting slaves in great numbers in 1494.” His way to treat the native residents was improper and rude, which is bad model to colonists who came later. A hero is supposed to be a decent man who get rid of bad reputation. Columbus’ behavior did not conform to the standard.

Because of the reasons given above, it will be hard to classify Christopher Columbus as a hero. His motivation to come to American continent was not noble. He set a bad example to colonists who came later. In addition, his arrival caused a catastrophe to local residents. Therefore, he is more like a villain than a hero.

brainliest plz

8 0
2 years ago
Which difficulty did Woodrow Wilson have to overcome to succeed in politics?
Rasek [7]
As Bookworm83 pointed out already, C nor D couldn't possibly correct, also due to the reason that he was able to come up with the 14 point plan. However, the real answer to your question would be A - he was very shy.

The shyness of Woodrow Wilson has been readily documented in variou sources and is also the reason why it's th ecorrect answer. Overcoming something like shyness was not an easy thing to do for him. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What prior knowledge can you apply to this passage? People can change—but they don’t always like it Humans are amazing in how ad
Romashka [77]

Answer:

Through effective electronic communication students can establish new friendships and tackle difficult problems from the viewpoint of students from different cultures. Pupils and staff gain first-hand knowledge of other education systems, customs and the reality of life in a country different from their own.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What was the goal of the dawes act of 1887 regarding native americans indians?
choli [55]
<span>The goal of the Dawes Act of 1887 regarding native americans indians was to divide up large amounts of Native lands and allocate it to individual Natives--in order to have the Natives "assimilate" more in the US. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Fertile Crescent Rainfall What does the map show about climate? Choose three answers. Black Sea Most rain falls north of the Fer
    6·2 answers
  • Why was starr and sunny seperated when they were 3 years old?
    8·1 answer
  • According to the concept of reincarnation a person would hope to return as a human
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these did Secretary of State William H. Seward purchase from<br> Russia in 1867?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the first US space rocket launched in 1958?
    5·2 answers
  • What are states’ rights?
    7·1 answer
  • Article 1 of the US constitution establishes which branch of the government?
    7·1 answer
  • 4. What tactics did José de San Martín and Simón Bolívar use to defeat Spanish forces in South America?
    15·1 answer
  • During his 1932 presidential re-election campaign, Republican President Herbert Hoover spoke out loudly against the New Deal pro
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!