Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise
Explanation:
When the Articles of Confederation underwent revision, there were many issues that were discussed. One of the major issues was the debate over the the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise. According to the Great Compromise, an equal right was to be distributed among the citizens to choose the representatives.
In the Three-Fifths Compromise, no debates were initiated on the issue of the complete abolition of slavery and granting them the citizenship. The slaves were agreed to be counted to be the three-fifth of the individual who were liable for taxation and representation.
The Nuremberg Trials (held for the primary purpose of bringing Nazi war criminals to justice) were a series of 13 trials carried out in Nuremberg, Germany (1945/1949). They were trials of the major war criminals which tried the core military and political leaders of Germany for crimes against humanity.
The Allies established the laws and procedures for the Nuremberg Trials with the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal (August 8, 1945). The charter, among other things, defined three categories: crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
<em>The city of Nuremberg in the German state of Bavaria was selected as the location for the trials because its Palace of Justice was relatively undamaged by the war (and included a large prison area).</em>
Seperated into seperate and individual countries
Answer:
false
Explanation:
some countries have witnessed a breach in these rules while others claim it is due to their culture etc
