The ethical decision-making models in counseling include the following:
- Justice
- Autonomy
- Beneficence
- Fidelity
- Nonmaleficence
<h3>What are the ethical decision-making models?</h3>
In counseling, the ethical decision-making models consist of the above-listed. Justice is a very important principle that counselors must abide by because the entire aim of counseling is to have an unbiased view of matters and offer accurate advice and informed decisions that are reached in an objective way.
Autonomy refers to the ability to assert independence and self-determination. All of these principles work together to make a well-rounded counselor.
Learn more about counseling here:
brainly.com/question/28275050
#SPJ4
This was a time of ongoing religious wars known as "Holy Wars". The capital of the Byzantine Empire, known as Constantinople, had fallen at the hands of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, who practiced the Muslim faith.
As a response, the western Christians gathered in arms and started a series of military campaigns known as <em>"The Crusades"</em> with the objective of retaking territories that were currently under Turkish (Muslim) control in the name of God. Spain had been one of these conquested territories, so at the time, people living in the Iberian Peninsula could be either Christian or Muslim.
The evidence for the claim that campaign money buys influence and elected officials ignore voters to please donors is tenuous.
<h3>What is a tenuous claim?</h3>
This is the type of claim that people make that cannot be said to be strong, definite of have been made sure of. People just make these types of claims based on the things that they think even though it may not exactly be true.
The claim that campaign money buys influence is tenuous based on the fact that the claim has not being tested to be true. It was just made by the people without any concrete information that would serve as pointers for the reason for such a speech.
Read more on claim here: brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Answer:
No, providing the jurisdiction follows the objective test
Explanation:
The objective test is aimed at providing evidence of objective nature, Meaning that in order for Jin to be accused the prosecutor has to prove that another reasonable person would not act like him in the same situation.
