Answer:
The following were long term impacts of the Korean War.
A. South Korea continues to be important in the Asian economy.
C. North Korea’s people are starving due to widespread food shortages and unemployment.
Explanation:
When the Korean war was over the North Korea`s territory was governed by a communist party and the South Korea's territory was governed by a capitalist territory. This difference created, had an enormous implication in the government of South Korea that increase its production and boost its economic performance while North Korea Lagged down as this country Isolated itself from trade as mandated by its socioeconomic structure.
As a result of this War North Korea was set to be a poor country with nutritional and production problems for their citizens, were the power is not chosen according to an election but it’s a dictatorship of the Workers Party of Korea (WPK). This Dictatorship is representing the interest of the (WPK) that is the only political party in the Country.
The best answer is B.
In the UN Security Council, there are five permanent members and ten temporary members elected for two year terms by the General Assembly.
The five permanent members are China, France, Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States.
The ten non-permanent members (with end of term date) are:
1. Angola (2016)
2. Egypt (2017)
3. Japan (2017)
4. Malaysia (2016)
5. New Zealand (2016)
6. Senegal (2017)
7. Spain (2016)
8. Ukraine (2017)
9. Uruguay (2017)
10. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 2016
Answer:
Meeting growing food needs. Providing consumers with high nutritional content (especially protein and long-chain omega-3 fatty acids) content. Reducing waste because feed efficiency of fish and shellfish is better than any other animal.
Explanation:
Hope this helps !!!
Explanation:
The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest court in the nation. Its decisions set precedents that all other courts then follow, and no lower court can ever supersede a Supreme Court decision. In fact, not even Congress or the president can change, reject or ignore a Supreme Court decision.
