1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatyana61 [14]
3 years ago
10

IS THIS CORRECT???????

English
2 answers:
posledela3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

yes it i correct!!!!!!! uwu.  :3.    ;P   v-v.      

Explanation:

Alina [70]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:ye

You might be interested in
What is correct reference entry for APA essay?
OleMash [197]
Uhhh its upside down
8 0
2 years ago
Which story stgory scenario would most likely be a parable
Pavel [41]
Are there answer choices?
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
''Sunrise over Fallujah'' Book In a discussion of the language of the war, one of the soldiers remarks, "I don't know why they c
zysi [14]

Answer:

The soldier is pointing out that:

a) It is often conflicting.

Explanation:

If people who are fighting against you open fire and kill you, we can say you were killed by enemy fire, since it was the enemy who shot. Thus, friendly fire means being killed by your friends, not by your enemy. However, <u>when the soldier says, "I don't know why they call it friendly fire if it kills you," he is paying more attention to the literal meaning of "friendly". "Friendly" can refer to people who are nice and kind. But it can also refer to something that is not harmful. If a product does not harm nature, we say it is environment-friendly. From this perspective, it does seem weird to call "friendly fire" something that is harmful, that can kill you. Thus, to this soldier, terminology used at war seems conflicting.</u>

5 0
3 years ago
Excerpt from Music to My Ears
timama [110]

Answer:

the phrase means something but would most likely be fully understood only by educators.

Explanation:Hope this answer helps

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As they were preparing to leave, Prince told William, "I have no freedom to fight for, sir."
Mademuasel [1]

The reason why Prince said he had no freedom to fight for is the fact that he was a slave, as stated in option 1 and further explained below.

<h3>Why can't Prince fight?</h3>

According to the passage we are analyzing here, Prince was a slave who belonged to William. His owner expect Prince to join him in battle, that is, to fight alongside him. However, Prince explains that he cannot do so.

The reason why Prince has "no freedom to fight for" is the fact that he was a slave. Prince could very well join William in battle, but what for? Why should he fight for freedom when he is denied it? How can a slave be asked to die for the freedom of white people when his own people are treated as possessions?

By saying so, Prince got William to free him. Apparently, that sentence was an eye-opener to his master, who only now realized the incoherence there is in asking a slave to fight for freedom.

With the information above in mind, we can select option 1 as the correct answer.

This is part of the missing passage which we need to answer this question:

"At the time he began his military service, William owned a slave like most of his peers. The slave, named Prince, would have been expected to join William and serve with him in battle. As they were preparing to leave, Prince told William, "I have no freedom to fight for, sir." Seeing the truth in this, William is reported to have freed Prince immediately. Today, we look back on history through a great fog of time, and with lenses clouded by our own modern values. Our Founding Fathers displayed admirable courage in crafting and signing such a brilliant claim to human liberty."

These are the missing answer choices:

  • He was a slave.
  • He was not a soldier.
  • He did not believe in fighting.
  • He was a British citizen.

Learn more about slaves here:

brainly.com/question/782305

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Wei-Chen was Jin Wang's foil in the first half of American Born Chinese, but in the second half of the story, he is Jin Wang's a
    15·2 answers
  • determine the meter of this poem which of the following is the correct following Robin Hood and scotchman
    6·1 answer
  • Use marshall plan in a sentence<br><br> plz help me
    9·1 answer
  • What argument does the author counter in this excerpt from Thomas Paine's Common Sense?
    10·1 answer
  • Which sentence uses hyphens correctly? I ordered two sugar-coated-pies. The pie was sugar-coated. I ordered two sugar-coated pie
    9·2 answers
  • A declarative sentence with prevaricate and fatality
    5·1 answer
  • What is a equation?<br>​
    8·2 answers
  • Please please please please please please help me
    12·1 answer
  • Worth 25
    6·2 answers
  • To my great surprise, I found myself reading more slowly than usual, savoring the words like a fine meal. . .
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!