The passage shows that Californian politics, and in particular, political advancement methods, were not wholly bound by law as they are now.
Governmental institutions and government control was weaker at that time, so it was difficult to enforce the law consistently. Because of it, people did not have a strong commitment to following legal paths for advancement. Revolutions and rebellions were more effective in seizing power than political campaigns, and there were few negative repercussions for those who chose that method.
1:Increasing demands
2:writing Declaration of Independence
3:writting constitution
Of course, liberals and conservatives had different reasons for criticizing the New Deal.
<span />
To conservatives, the New Deal was socialism. It used taxpayer money to help people who were in need. That is redistribution of income and it can be seen as a step towards socialism. Conservatives saw it in this way.
To liberals, the New Deal did not do enough. Many liberals wanted to see much more in the way of government spending. For example, Dr. Francis Townsend wanted the government to give very generous pensions to all seniors on the condition that they spend all of their stipend every month, thus increasing demand in the economy. Liberals, then, wanted more radical action than President Roosevelt was willing to take.
Answer: Yes it did honey
Explanation: The Slavery Abolition Act 1833 (3 & 4 Will. IV c. 73) abolished slavery throughout the British Empire.
Answer:
The political need met by this shift to feudalism was that the people of western Europe had issues with security and needed a source of protection from threats.
This led to the political aspect of the people who were rich and wealthy providing enough security for the populace while the people from the lower class ensured they were submissive to the rich class as a means of exchange and appreciation.
