Answer: Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, which would diminish the rights of the states and of individuals. The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to alleviate their fears.
Further detail:
The Anti-Federalists had opposed ratification of the US Constitution. The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states. Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA. They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.
The Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided some reassurance to Anti-Federalists after the fight over ratification, because these amendments to the Constitution served to guarantee that individuals' rights would be protected under federal law.
I think that what you're looking for is Manifest Destiny, the idea that it was natural, required and proper of the settlers to expand across the continent.
Some connected this to God (that is, that God devised this expansion as His plan), but God is not always necessarily connected to this idea.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "b. quota." The <span>economic policy did OPEC use which led to the energy crisis is called the quota. In this way, it will eventually be managed and monitored.</span>
Generally speaking, Britain "<span>went to war against the revolutionary government," but only after it became clear that the Revolutionary government was going to be more harmful than the old regime. </span>
