1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
JulsSmile [24]
3 years ago
15

How does Buddhism compare to monotheistic religions as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam?

History
1 answer:
Alina [70]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Unlike Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Buddhism is neither monotheistic nor polytheistic. Buddhism is a spiritual belief, and does not worship any gods.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What techniques does President Obama use to build his argument and make the speech persuasive? Check the five boxes that apply.
ki77a [65]

<h2></h2><h2>1 2 3 5 6</h2>

powerful, passionate word choice

memorable examples from history

engaging word choice and imagery

word choice that inspires unity

commonly understood language

<h2>I got it right on ED2020</h2>

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1920s many rural banks failed because
IRINA_888 [86]
In the 1920s, many rural banks failed because banks had speculated in stocks. This in turn, led to failure of such banks and then soon after the Great Depression followed.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
.
MrRissso [65]
I"m not really sure but i think the answer is C.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did north get in slavery in the Constitutional compromise?​Someone that is good at U. S. history,please help me.Please some
professor190 [17]

Answer:

The "Three-fifths compromise"

Explanation:

An agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.

7 0
3 years ago
I really need help on this
PtichkaEL [24]

Do you know the context?

I suppose the quotation is stressing that the writer has put a lot of effort into getting their argument/grievances heard by the parliament, and that said parliament is 'tyrannical', implying that it rules without concern for the people or accountability to them. It seems that the quote may be a way of justifying some later action, essentially saying; 'we've tried and failed to do this in the proper way, so now we must be more forceful'.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The 5th amendment prevents the federal government from depriving a person of
    11·2 answers
  • Should the United States should use the Electoral College to elect the President and Vice President.
    6·2 answers
  • Match each power with the branch of US government that wields it.
    8·2 answers
  • What were some universities available in Virginia during 1800-1839
    13·1 answer
  • How long was world war 2
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP .. after 9/11 were Muslim Americans treated differently or the same as Japanese Americans and German Americans? How?
    14·1 answer
  • Independence movement and consequences in India
    12·1 answer
  • Create a timeline of the conquest of the inca by Francisco pizarro
    11·1 answer
  • In the 1890s, ___ expanded his banking empire to colossal proportions. His bank houses were so large that they loaned money to o
    11·1 answer
  • Social and political causes of the February and October revolutions
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!