By both looks muscle tone strength and fighting skill and pervouces job
Answer #1, not a cause of Protestant Reformation:
Answer #2, not a consequence of Protestant Reformation:
Explanation:
The Thirty Years' War was one of the Wars of Religion that followed as a consequence of the Protestant Reformation. The Protestant Reformation is usually dated as beginning in 1517 with Martin Luther's posting of his 95 Theses concerning the sale of indulgences. The Thirty Years' War was fought a century after that, from 1618-1648.
The Columbian Exchange is the name given to transfer of plants, animals, culture, people, ideas and more between Europe, the American continents, and West Africa, in the 15th and 16th centuries. It is named after Christopher Columbus, who was credited with "discovering" the lands of the Western Hemisphere with his voyages beginning in 1492. The Columbian Exchange happened around the same time as the Protestant Reformation and its aftermath were occurring in Europe, but the two were not related events.
Here's your correct matching arrangements:
1. This form of imperial rule involved claiming exclusive trading rights in certain areas. Trading rights must be granted under the threat of military force. In the 19th century, this type of imperial rule was used by countries such as Great Britain, France, Portugal, Russia, and Japan in China.
2. Local rulers such as kings or sultans were used to govern the colonies in order to lessen the possibility of a revolt. Great Britain practiced this type of imperialism.
3. A form of imperial rule in which local rulers were left in place, however, they were expected to follow the advice of imperial advisers on issues such as trade and missionary activity. In this form of imperial rule, the countries are still independent, however, they are under the protection of an imperial country.
4. Officials and soldiers from the imperial country were sent to control the colony. This type of imperial rule was practiced by the French.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same cartoon that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that he is implying that individual freedom is "overrated", since is shows a person blatantly disrespecting the law, which leads to a "trampling" of the rights of another citizen. </span></span>
Answer:
C.Loss of jobs to Mexico that he predicted NAFTA would cause
Explanation:
North American Free Trade Agreement is a treaty entered by the United States, Canada and Mexico which came into effect on January 1,1994 it was sign by President Clinton, it was the largest free trade agreement in the world. It goal was to reduce trading cost, increase business investment and help North America be more competitive in the global market, and it was created as a response to trade competition posed by China and the EU.
According to the testimony given to the Congress ,North American Free Trade Agreement(NAFTA) skeptics cite the loss of United States manufacturing jobs as a reason to criticize. This skeptics cited was right because according to CFR, the United States auto sector actually lost roughly 350000 jobs between 1994 and 2016 and many of the job lose were taken up by worker in mexico.
