At present, migration continues to be a strong phenomenon in regions such as Latin America and Africa due to the poor living conditions in some countries of these regions.
<h3>What is migration?</h3>
Migration is a term to refer to the movement of an individual or group from their country of origin to other countries seeking to improve their living conditions or for other reasons.
<h3>What is the current situation of migration?</h3>
Migration is a phenomenon that is still present in society because some regions of the world do not offer good living conditions to their citizens. An example of this is Venezuela and some African countries.
<h3>How does this influence immigration policy?</h3>
Migration directly influences migration policy because the receiving countries of migrants must modify their laws to adapt the functioning of society to this phenomenon. In some countries, aid is given to migrants, while in others they are persecuted and expelled.
Learn more about immigration in: brainly.com/question/13688875
#SPJ1
<span>Hello! During the Spain Golden Age, which was between the 16th and 17th centuries, the empire was based upon the mutual support of the Catholic church. Besides that, it's true to say that Spain became one of the greatest commercial power in Europe, with a centralized government, but it's wrong to say that the country turns on in a industrial potency, once there is no industry in early 17th. So, the incorrect one is: Spain became a leading commercial and industrial power in Europe. Hugs!</span>
Answer:The pre-Enlightenment world was simultaneously both fascinating and frightening. People often ad no choice but to rely on their imaginations to make sense of the myriad phenomena around them. The result was a world where everything seemed magical; a place teeming with angels, demons, fairies, and witches. Only through uncanny and sometimes ‘ridiculous’ superstitions did many people of the Dark Ages (or Middle Ages or Medieval Period) in Europe try to make sense of their world. Jamil Bakhtawar explains.
Explanation: no cap
Answer:
Hi there, Your answer to this is New England.
New England did a lot of trading from goods to slaves and with that their economy was really good compare to the other colonies.
Hope this is correct :)
Have a great day
It was caused by collectivization. The food was gathered and taken away from all lands of Ukrainian people by the Soviet Union and people starved. But political debates also contributed to this famine.
Explanation:
The Great Famine of 1932-1933 wasn't solely the end result<span> of </span>constitution however conjointly a crucial plan of action<span> in </span>status policy<span>, </span>an effort<span> by the Soviet Regime </span>to unravel<span> its Ukrainian </span>drawback<span> once and for all. Firstly the liquidation of the kulaks - </span>the higher<span> off peasants - was a politically </span>impelled<span> act of lunacy. The kulaks </span>weren't happier as a result of<span> they were exploiting the </span>employees<span> - </span>because the<span> Bolsheviks argued - </span>however<span>, in truth, they were </span>happier as a result of<span> they were </span>higher<span> farmers. By removing them from the land, and imposing </span>town<span> born, politically trained managers on the farms, Ukrainian agricultural output fell. </span>
<span>Secondly the peasants themselves, </span>inadvertently<span>, helped </span>to form<span> the famine worse. </span>so as to forestall<span> the collective from taking their </span>eutherian<span> and grain surpluses, they destroyed them. This meant that there was no food store </span>to examine<span> them through any worse times.</span>
