Well, one big benefit would more than likely be that if you have a strike and you go on for a long time and stop working your boss is going to give you what you want. They may not give you everything but they will more than likely give you most of your demands. But one big danger would be facing the fact of being fired. If you don't work and you go on strike you could be facing the fact of being fired. With this being said I personally think that this isn't a solution that people should go to because it can be dangerous because it can lead to death or the loss of a job.
I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest
This is a opinion based answer but there is 3 main answers to this question one is yes they should be able to take their rights away because us having the freedom to do anything can be dangerous for the government second is no they shouldn’t just because we are going into war doesn’t give them the rights to take our freedoms away because it could cause more problems within the way and the third is no they shouldn’t be able too unless their given a valid reason to take their right and then give an example
Answer:
Explanation: C
good luck and God bless! :)
Answer:
Style of fighting
Explanation:
One major difference between the Korean War and the Vietnam War was the style of fighting: “The Korean War was characterized by short bursts of fighting whereas Vietnam tended to be long and drawn out."
A: Colonial resistance was widespread in all areas.
