Answer:
Background Essay on Late 19th and Early 20th Century Immigration. ... Unlike earlier nineteenth century immigration, which consisted primarily of immigrants from Northern Europe, the bulk of the new arrivals hailed mainly from Southern and Eastern Europe.
Explanation:
The answer is <span>more Americans died here than in all other wars the country had been involved in combined.</span>
I would say there’s nothing in the first ten amendments that directly states the government’s ability to have or to not have a curfew, but the 1st amendment would allow the right for someone to peacefully disagree.
The 1st Amendment is your freedom of RAPPS,
so it’s freedom of :
R - religion
A - assembly
P - press
P - petition
S - speech
Generally, city wide curfews such as this are more along the lines of a suggestion or a guideline put in place for safety. If someone decides they want to put their safety at risk, that’s on them. But when you start getting into the other aspects of the 1st amendment (like Petition, Assembly, etc.) you start to get into a place where you might violate other laws.
In other words, it’s likely within the right of those who disagree to express their disagreement, but it’s also within the right of the law enforcement to reprimand them if they directly interfere with the safety of others, like the workers restoring the power, for example.
Like at the end of Scream (1996), they have a city-wide curfew because there’s a killer on the loose. Then all of the teenagers decided to have a curfew party to protest the curfew. If those kids had gotten arrested, it wouldn’t have been directly for having the party (a.k.a. the defiance of the curfew) but they might get arrested for drinking alcohol.
1.the answer is a because the south grows better crops 2. The Wilmot Proviso was a more-or-less religious declaration that slavery wouldnot be permitted in any of the new territories that were likely to be admittedto the USA. This would increase Northern dominance of Congress, and enable moreraising of taxes on imports - the big controversy in the South, which had nomanufacturing industry, and depended largely on imported goods3. I'm not sure for this one sorry 4. Because
it allowed citizens to decide whether they had slaves or not: the law
passed in the United States, in 1854, was enacted to create the states
of Nebraska and Kansas, which, in addition, were forbidden to have legal
slaves by the Missouri Compromise of 1820, thus,
with the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Missouri Compromise was annulled,
without achieving that Kansas attained a legal slave state, allowed the
citizens of the newly formed states, to have votes to decide whether
slavery was allowed or not. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was the precursor to the Civil War of 1861.
Answer:
A. separation of powers
Explanation:
As someone who just finished taking the APUSH exam today that would be my best guess.
