Answer:
D. High school students
Explanation:
The intended audience for this text is most likely high school students. We can assume this because high school students are the people who usually have to work on this type of assignments. They are also more likely to require instructions in order to do so well, and to need to follow guidelines in order to create a piece of content.
Please only add school related questions on here
Answer and explanation:
This is the context in which the word "telerobbery" appears in the story:
<em>Nothing changes on its face or anything, but I get a pretty bad feeling right then. I mean, an even worse feeling. And, sure enough, I hear the servos in the thing’s arm start to grind. Now it turns and swings me to the left, smashing the side of my head into the door of the pie fridge hard enough to crack the glass. The whole right side of my head feels cold and then warm. Then the side of my face and neck and arm all start to feel really warm, too. Blood’s shooting out of me like a [...] fire hydrant.
</em>
<em>Jesus, I’m crying. And that’s when… uh. That’s when Felipe shows up.
</em>
<em>Do you give the domestic robot money from the register?
</em>
<em>What? It doesn’t ask for money. It never asked for money. It doesn’t say a word. What went down wasn’t a telerobbery, man. I don’t even know if it was being remote controlled, Officer …
</em>
<em>What do you think it wants?
</em>
<em>It wants to kill me. That’s all.</em>
<em />
From this passage, we can understand a man has been attacked by his robot. The officer who is asking the questions to understand the reasons for the attack asks if the robot wanted money. The man then answers that what took place was not a telerobbery, that he doesn't even know if the robot was being remote controlled. <u>From those clues, we can safely assume telerobbery is a robbery performed by a robot that is being controlled by someone or something that is not present.</u>
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The reason to support the B choice relies on the fact that this part of the declaration gets into transfering the idea that those who have written the document have gone through unfortunate situations that may be labeled as unfair, so the "Pathos" can actually apply to this text for the writer's indirect invitation to feel compassion for the others.
Answer:
<u>This quote can be broken down into two parts:
</u>
the first :
who does not examine does not believe.
it means that whoever does not check a hypothesis will not believe it
"I have no proof so I do not believe it" if you do not try to check ... it's not going to change.
the second part:
who does not doubt not examine.
he who is persuaded to be right is not even going to be able to make a mistake.
"Why waste my time to check since I'm sure I'm right?"
suddenly the first will never progress since if he doubts everything without ever checking ... he will continue to doubt and that's all
and the second who does not doubt anything (and especially not him) will not progress because he does not consider that things could be otherwise or that he could make a mistake, as small as it is.
