Answer:
D. create tension and support his critical tone.
Explanation:
In Galway Kinnell's "Vapor Trail Reflected in the Frog Pond," Kinnell uses allusions to create tension and support his critical tone.
The author was critical of the Vietnam War and the government's involvement in it. He used allusion to help support his tone.
Answer: The effect of the point of view is A) the reader gets direct advice on the process. Moreover, the author's purpose is A) to explain how to get around meat restrictions. Finally, the point of view that the author uses in this passage is B) Second person.
Explanation: The point of view that the author uses in this passage is second person as<u> he is directly addressing the reader.</u> What indicates this is the <u>use of the second person pronoun "you"</u>. As a result,<u> the reader receives direct advice from the writer</u>, which is mainly expressed in the first sentence ("If you are really determined to eat meat all week, it is possible to buy a license to do so"). Therefore, the advice is the effect of the second person point of view. As regards the author's purpose, <u>he intends to explain the reader how to eat meat despite the restrictions</u> set on the consumption of this type of food. This is also expressed in the first sentence of the passage.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
A research paper turned in for credit is indeed the final product.
Answer:
the one the question is refering to.
The writing 'rule' (myth) Churchill's reply satirizes is the 'Never end a sentence on a preposition' rule (i.g. as I intetionally did on the immediate sentence before this one). And his reply to it was something like 'This is the type of errant pedantry up with which I will not put.'
The 'rule' is a myth, yes, but of course what Churchill did was an exaggeration to sneeringly point out the ignorance of those who criticized him.
His sentence therefore was incorrect. One possible change to improve it could be: 'This is the type of errant pedantry which I will not put up with.'
Specially the 'up' and 'with' of 'put up with' could never go in the middle of a sentence, as 'put up with' is a phrasal verb, meaning the verb and the preposition must always be together in the correct order.
I was able to find some possible variations of what his sentence could have actually had been, but in none of them the 'up with' goes along with 'put', so either ways we can assume that his sentence was deliberately wrong.
Explanation:
brainly
The main idea is to find courage within yourself, she wanted to do many things , but was to afraid to do things in the movie
