1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Roman55 [17]
3 years ago
6

Solve the following equation for x.​

Mathematics
1 answer:
sveticcg [70]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

If you just solve normally, you will get x=2 and x=-3. But if you plug these in to check your work, you will find that they are wrong. Your answer is no solution

Step-by-step explanation:

ln(2x+3)+ln(x-2)=ln(x^2-2x)

<em>Rule: log(a) + log(b) = log(a*b)</em>

ln( (2x+3)(x-2) ) = ln(x^2-2x)

<em>Rule: If log(a) = log(b) then a = b</em>

(2x+3)(x-2) = x^2 - 2x

2x^2-x-6=x^2-2x

x^2+x-6=0

<em>Using Quadratic Formula:</em>

x = 2 and x = -3

But, plugging these numbers back into the original equation is false!

You might be interested in
What is= X less then 12
miskamm [114]

Answer:

12-x

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Find an equivalent system of equations for the following system x + 2y = 2, -4x + 4y = -8
agasfer [191]

Answer:

2x + 4y = 4

-8x + 8y = -16.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can find an equivalent system by multiply the 2 equations by 2.

x + 2y = 2  multiplied by 2 is 2x + 4y = 4.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what number u give me : 1. Bae 2. Bestie 3. Homie 4. R.O.D 5. Shawty 6. Friends 7.Be Mines? 8. Baby Girl 9. Boo 10. Sey Pickle 1
Anon25 [30]

Answer:

14. 1. would u be mine?

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Nineteen immigrants to the U.S. were asked how many years, to the nearest year, they have lived in the U.S. The data are as foll
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

a) The frequency of the data "<em>15</em>" and "<em>20</em>" is 2 for both, not 1; this means their relative frequency is 2/19 for both, not 1/19; finally, the cumulative relative frequency in the row of the data "15" should be 0.8947, not 0.8421. This error might have happened because someone didn't count the numbers correctly, so they only noticed one "15" and one "20" when, in fact, there were two people that had lived in the U.S. for 15 years, and two more people for 20 years. On the other hand, the error in the cumulative relative frequency happened because it accounted for only one person living in the U.S. for 15 years, instead of two people.

b) Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. from 0 to 5 years, <em>not </em>for 5 years. The cumulative relative frequency in this row (47%) accounts for every data gathered so far, not just the "5 years" row. The correct statement would be that <em>3 out of 19</em>, or 15.8% (relative frequency) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) First of all, to avoid errors like the one in the problem's table, <em>we should first place the given numbers from least to greatest</em>, so we can construct a new frequency table by ourselves. Let's do just that, and we'll end up with something like this:

0 , 0, 2 , 2, 2, 4, 5, 5, 5, 7, 7, 10, 10, 12, 12 , 15, 15, 20, 20

Now we'll have a much easier time from now on.

2) The second step is to <em>construct the Data and Frequency columns</em>. Just place each unique integer in a new row of the <em>Data </em>column, then count how many times that unique integer was found, and, finally, place that number below the <em>Frequency </em>column (<em>Please refer to the Excel Worksheet provided as an attachment). </em>

Let's do it as follows:

Data     Frequency

0            2

2            3

4            1

5            3

7            2

10           2

12           2

15           2

20          2

<em>Note that we counted "15" and "20" twice! So each one of those rows have a frequency of 2, not 1 as the table presented in the problem suggests. </em>

3) Next, we want to construct the Relative frequency and Cumulative relative frequency columns. For the relative frequency column, <em>we just divide the frequency of each row by the total number of immigrants surveyed, which is 19</em>. For the cumulative relative frequency column, <em>we will get each row's relative frequency, and add the cumulative relative frequency of the row before it</em>. Note that for the first row, the cumulative relative frequency is the same as its relative frequency.

We should get something like this:

Data    Frequency    Relative frequency    Cumulative relative frequency

0            2                   2/19                               0.1053

2            3                   3/19                               0.2632

4            1                    1/19                                0.3158

5            3                   3/19                               0.4737

7            2                   2/19                               0.5789

10           2                   2/19                               0.6842

12           2                   2/19                               0.7895

15           2                   2/19                               0.8947

20          2                   2/19                               1.0000

<em>Note that the relative frequency for both "15" and "20" is 2/19 instead of 1/19! Also, we got a cumulative relative frequency of 0.8947 in the row of "15", instead of 0.8421.</em>

4) a) We have just fixed the error in the table, but we have to <em>explain how someone might have arrived at the incorrect number(s)</em>. The most logical way that someone might have gotten the incorrect frequencies of "15" and "20" is that <em>they didn't count the numbers correctly while building the Frequency column</em>. This could have happened because <em>that person probably didn't order the numbers from least to greatest</em>, as we did in Step 1, which makes it way easier to get the frequency of each data without making a mistake.

5) b) We have now to <em>explain what is wrong with the statement "47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years</em>.

To answer that, we can refer to the relative frequency of the row of the data "5", which tells us that 3 out of 19 (or roughly 15.8%) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years. <em>Relative frequency is telling us the percentage of people that have lived for </em><em>this </em><em>amount of time.</em>

By contrast, <em>the cumulative relative frequency of this same row tells us that </em>0.4737, or roughly 47%, of the people surveyed have lived for 5 years or less. Cumulative relative frequency accounts for the data presented in its row, <em>plus </em>the data presented in the rows before it.

So the correct statement would be either:

  • 15.8% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years, or
  • Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years or less.
Download xlsx
7 0
4 years ago
Find the domain and range of the relation and determine whether it is a function.
Anna [14]
The correct answer to this question is this "domain: x > 1; range: y > 0; Yes, it is a function."

Based from the graph, <span>it has a vertical asymptote at x = 1, so domain is x > 1 </span><span>and since it has horizontal asymptote at y=0, its range is y > 0. So this concludes us to have a domain of x > 1 and a range of y > 0.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • SIMPLIFY the radical expression: square root of 75 + square root of 3
    8·1 answer
  • Vanessa earns a base salary of $400.00 every week with an additional5% commission on everything she sells. Vanessa sold $1650.00
    11·1 answer
  • There are 6 boys and 9 girls in the church's youth group. Among the choices below, what is the best description of the ratio to
    13·1 answer
  • Which fraction is equivalent to -5/9
    8·1 answer
  • Use the product rule to simplify the radical. <br> <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D%20336" id="TexFormula1" titl
    12·1 answer
  • Please help<br><br><br> 1. 4e22 in scientific notation<br><br> 2. 2.9e-33 in scientific notation
    5·2 answers
  • Please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • » Which expression shows 35 + 15 written as a product of two factors?
    13·2 answers
  • What are the steps to solving <br> 3x=4+2(3−x).
    8·2 answers
  • If y = – 2x^3 + 4x^2 – 9; find y when x = 2 and x = −2
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!