Hello!
The most accurate answer is
<span>B.
Twentieth-century archaeologists unearthed many artifacts near the Indus River.
</span>
Glad to help :)
One of the ways in which English kings increased their power and reduce the power of the nobles was that they "strengthened the courts"--since this allowed more of their laws and decrees to pass.
Effect: Korematsu v. United States was a Supreme Court case that was decided on December 18, 1944, at the end of World War II. It involved the legality of Executive Order 9066, which ordered many Japanese-Americans to be placed in internment camps during the war.
About 10 weeks after the U.S. entered World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942 signed Executive Order 9066. The order authorized the Secretary of War and the armed forces to remove people of Japanese ancestry from what they designated as military areas and surrounding communities in the United States. These areas were legally off limits to Japanese aliens and Japanese-American citizens.
The order set in motion the mass transportation and relocation of more than 120,000 Japanese people to sites the government called detention camps that were set up and occupied in about 14 weeks.
Many countries wanted to control over many economic activities in other countries as well as utilize other countries for cheap labor. In addition, some countries wanted to explore the world and conquer for their homeland while other countries thought that their own country and race was superior to all other countries and therefore believed it was needed that they invade other countries and educate them as well as some countries practicing imperialism to convert people to their religion.
Answer:
Tinker v. Des Moines remains an important precedent setting case as its subject matter, freedom of speech, is relevant to this day, especially in the ever changing political climate
Explanation:
The outcome of Tinker v. Des Moines determined that student's do not lose their first amendment right to free speech on school grounds, and it's unconstitutional to limit a students speech as long as it's not harming anyone.
