This describes a disorder
Answer:
A) They both had the Free Exercise Clause, or the First Amendment.
B) Wisconsin v. Yoder was about kids not finishing school while Employment Division v. Smith was about doing illegal drugs in the workplace. That is why they had different holdings even though they were both for a religious purpose.
C) A member of the public that is upset about the holding in Employment Division v. Smith could have people sign petitions to pass a new law that would overturn the holding made by the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
Yes, because it won't make much sense if you put them out of order.
Each of these ODEs is linear and homogeneous with constant coefficients, so we only need to find the roots to their respective characteristic equations.
(a) The characteristic equation for
is
which arises from the ansatz 
.
The characteristic roots are 
and 
. Then the general solution is
where 
are arbitrary constants.
(b) The characteristic equation here is
with a root at 
of multiplicity 2. Then the general solution is
(c) The characteristic equation is
with roots at 
, where 
. Then the general solution is
Recall Euler's identity,
Then we can rewrite the solution as
or even more simply as
If a segment is separated by a midpoint, that means both sides are equal. therefore,
DE = EF
6x - 58 = 44
now just solve for x
6x = 102
x = 17
