Answer: D is correct.
Explanation: laws of reason are mere fictions. Philosophy of rights is dedicated to this issue but in its very fundaments there are fundamental questions that are still not answered (becase both laws of nature and laws of reason are products of human intellect, i.e. they cannot be experimentally proved. In spite of its fictitious nature, theese laws became one of the pillars of Enlightenment. French philophers, for example, attempted to ground ethics on mathematics which proved to be inviable.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
A talks about one war being more horrific than the other, which is up to opinion. For example, I may think World War 1 was more horrific, but you may think World War 2 was more horrific. It is an opinion.
A majority of the world's countries participating in World War 2 is a fact. 30 nations participated in World War 2, which is a fact and is not up to opinion.
Japan's surrender ending the War is a fact, the war did end when Japan surrendered, it is not an opinion.
The amount of deaths that happened in the war is a statistic, which is purely factual.
True, textbooks are a primary source. (P.S We are learning about primary and secondary sources in social studies and I got the same question)
