1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Crazy boy [7]
2 years ago
13

GIVING BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP!!

History
1 answer:
Whitepunk [10]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

In the 1950's, Communism was a big no-no, so when Communist North Korea invade South Korea the United Nations responded by sending financial aid to South Korean defenders and it began to think about sending troops to fight off the Commies.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following best completes the graphic organizer above?
Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer:

Criminal

Explanation:

I took the quiz

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a absolute monarchy, how much power does the king have over the citizens
sineoko [7]
The King has full power over citizens in his kimgdom
7 0
3 years ago
What was added to the Constitution as a compromise to get support from all the states needed to ratify it?
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

The bill of rights

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which principle of democracy establishes that the government represents the people and ultimately has to answer to the people fo
podryga [215]

Answer:

o que é sistema socialista?

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
describe the embargo act 1807, and at least three issues which arose form the act that worked to divide the nation and ultimatel
Nataly [62]
The Embargo Act of 1807 was a general trade embargo on all foreign nations that was enacted by the US Congress. As a successor or replacement law for the 1806 Non-importation Act and passed as the Napoleonic Wars continued, it represented an escalation of attempts to coerce Britain to stop its impressment of American sailors and to respect American sovereignty and neutrality but also attempted to pressure France and other nations in the pursuit of In the first decade of the 19th century, American merchant shipping grew. Particularly Britain but also France thus targeted neutral American shipping as a means to disrupt enemy trade. American merchantmen, their cargo, and sometimes crew members were seized as contraband of war by European navies, sometimes under cover of official orders. The British Royal Navy, in particular, resorted to impressment and forced some American seamen into naval service on the pretext that the seamen had been "born British" and were still British subjects. Americans saw the Chesapeake–Leopard affair as a glaring example of a British violation of American neutrality.

Congress imposed the embargo in direct response to these events. US President Thomas Jefferson acted with restraint, weighed public support for retaliation, and recognized that the United States was far weaker than either Britain or France. He recommended that Congress respond with commercial warfare, a policy that appealed to Jefferson both for being experimental and for foreseeably harming his domestic political opponents more than his allies, whatever its effect on the European belligerents. The 10th Congress was controlled by his allies and agreed to the Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 1807.

The embargo failed totally. It did not improve the American diplomatic position, highlighted American weakness and lack of leverage, significantly damaged only the American economy, and sharply increased domestic political tensions. Both widespread evasion of the embargo and loopholes in the legislation reduced its impact on its targets. British commercial shipping, which already dominated global trade, was successfully adapting to Napoleon's Continental System by pursuing new markets, particularly in the restive Spanish and Portuguese South American colonies. Thus, British shippers were well-positioned to grow at American expense when the embargo reduced American trade activity.

The embargo undermined American unity by provoking bitter protests, particularly in New England commercial centers. Support for the declining Federalist Party, which intensely opposed Jefferson, temporarily rebounded and drove electoral gains in 1808. The embargo simultaneously undermined Americans' faith that their government could execute laws fairly and strengthened the European perception that the republican form of government was inept and ineffectual.

Replacement legislation for the ineffective embargo was enacted on March 1, 1809, in the last days of Jefferson's presidency. Tensions with Britain continued to grow and eventually led to the War of 1812. general diplomatic and economic leverage.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which two factors explain why salt was so valuable to West Africans?
    13·1 answer
  • What country had irregular coastline, abundant minerals resources, large labor force, investment capital
    13·2 answers
  • 13th century agreement limiting the power of King John. Established the principles of due process of law and trial by jury. Its
    9·1 answer
  • What religious and magical beliefs does the document suggest??
    12·1 answer
  • What was the result of the Japanese invasion of Manchuria?
    6·2 answers
  • What item do we use everyday made by the han chinese?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not characteristic of Maryland?
    7·2 answers
  • What were the cultural contributions in the Southern Colonies?
    10·1 answer
  • Throughout World War I, for which activity were airplanes most often used?
    10·2 answers
  • 8. India was the birthplace of two major religions that were
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!