Answer: Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct option: The marginal utility from consuming good A will be lower than before.
This due to the law of diminishing marginal utility. When the price of good A falls as result consumer will buy more quantity of good A. But according to the law of diminishing marginal utility, as the consumers consumes more and more quantity of good, the utility derived from an additional unit goes on diminishing.
Therefore, the marginal utility from consuming good A will be lower than before.
Increase capital markets for example profit market
Increase its visibility in search results on search engines
Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
a) Usually a contract has the following elements:
Offer
.
Acceptance
.
Consideration
.
Intention to create a legal relationship
.
In the given case, the intention to create a legal relationship is missing. Though Study had sent a written legal contract to Burrow to affirm the contract, Burrow did not show any interest regarding the same. Hence Burrow can’t be sued for breach of contracts. Moreover the confirmation letter sent by Study does not qualify under the Merchant Memo Rule as the involved parties are not merchants. Burrow can use the terms of UCC for his favour. The UCC states that any contract with value more than $500 must be in writing. As the involved amount in this case is $1300, hence this case does not qualify as a contract under UCC.
b) If Study and Burrow were merchants, then the Merchant Memo Rule gets applicable. Then in that case, if 2 merchants enter into an oral contract, which is worth $500 or more and one of the merchant sends a written confirmation for the same, then a contract will be considered enforceable. In such a case, Burrow will be held liable for breach of contract and can be sued by Study.
The National SMART grant <span />
