The correct option is option D ("Read the results section before you read the discussion section").
Taking a look at the results before you read the discussion section will allow you to form your own interpretation after analysing the content of the article <u>without being biased by what the author's conclusion was in light of the results</u>.
Here's my interpretatin of why the other options are wrong:
A) You should always start with the introduction and never with the abstract. <u>If you first read the abstract, you run the risk of becoming biased towards the author's perspective from the get go</u>.
B) & C) The discussion and conclusion sections should always be the last thing you read. <u>You need to understand the whole article by yourself and generate your own interpretation to be able to contrast it with the author's conclusion and other points of view expressed in the discussion</u>.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
I would first be really tensed up for the first hour, I would be thinking multiple questions like, "what if I never get out?", "How will I survive?". But then, I would slowly calm down and think on the bright side. I would be sure that I would be getting out of the traffic jam. In the meantime, I would listen to the radio and stream some music to kill time.
Explanation:
Answer:
gghuopnvxzzzdfgjnnmkllolln
Um what’s the question I’m confused
The appropriate response is a psychological strategy. It is a more profound and more unpredictable engagement with a content. Basic perusing is a procedure of breaking down, deciphering and, at times, assessing. When we read fundamentally, we utilize our basic intuition abilities to ask both the content and our own particular perusing of it.
