Answer:
top down management
Explanation:
This organizational structure seen in the picture is a representation of top down management. In this structure, the individual at the top of the hierarchy has the most power and full command. Instructions are passed down the chain of command. For example, the CEO is in charge of the company and gives orders to the Managers (Production and Marketing). These managers follow that order and decide what orders to give the individual's under their supervision in the chain of command. These individuals are represented by the connecting lines in the diagram to the Managers. Once these individuals (Foremen and Sales Officer's) receive their orders, they create and relay their own orders down to the Workers and Salespeople.
Answer:
C. planning; marketing plan
Explanation:
A marketing process is the establishment of goals for a marketing campaign. <em>During the planning phase, you'll need to set your target customers and how to approach them, this will lead to specific and measurable goals to direct your next actions.</em>
I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!
The blurring of the lines separating the subsets of the financial industry started in the <span>1990s. The blurring
of the lines that separate the subsets of the financial industry was initiated
in the 1990s under the regime of the president of the US, Bill Clinton. At the time,
the financial products were mainly loans, payment services, deposits, savings,
and fiduciary services. </span>
Answer: broad span of control
Explanation: Reorganizing and eliminating layers of management in order to remain profitable often results in a broad span of control. When layers of management are eliminated, organizations tend to get flatter (a flat organization consists of fewer layers of management), spans of control (which are the areas of activity and number of functions, these managers are responsible for) get wider, and the remaining managers usually empower employees to make more decisions due to wider spans of control.
Answer:
$27,500
Explanation:
The computation of the partnership loss borne by the Nelson is shown below:
= (Contributed amount by Nelson) ÷ (Firm contribution amount) × (loss incurred)
= ($50,000) ÷ ($200,000) × ($110,000)
= 0.25 × $110,000
= $27,500
The firm contribution amount would be calculated below:
= Wilson contributed amount + Pickett contributed amount + Nelson contributed amount
= $100,000 + $50,000 + $50,000
= $200,000
