Answer:
false
Explanation:
Barcelona has a network structure because it works with staffing agencies to fill many vacant positions.
When a company has a network structure, it works with other companies in order to produce a good or service (outsourcing). In this case, Barcelona outsources some of its human resources functions to other companies.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the expected return and the standard deviation is given below:
the expected return is
= $90,000 × 13% + $60,000 × 6.6%
= $15,660.00
And,
standard deviation of return is
= $90,000 × 13% × 44% + $60,000 × 6.6%
= $5,148 + $3,960
= $9,108.00
In this way it should be calculated
Answer:
See explanation section
Explanation:
The difference between buying shares and buying bonds are as follows:
1. Buying stock gives a person to own the company while buying a bond that provides a person to become a debt-holder of the company who can receive interest and get the entire amount in the future.
2. Purchasing stock gives an individual the voting right to elect the board of directors of a company. Buying bonds does not give voting rights to the bondholders.
3. Stock owners can receive the profit in the name of dividends. Bondholders do not receive any profit. Instead, they receive interest annually.
Answer:
No, there is no contract between the two parties because of withdrawal of offer (Revocation) before the acceptance of the other party.
Explanation:
When one party offers another party and after some time the offer maker withdraws the offer by communicating that they had revoked then the offer is no more available to the other party and is often termed as Revocation. So when the offer maker revokes before the acceptance of the offer by the other party then their is no offer at consideration to the other party, which means if there is no offer then their can not be an acceptance of an offer and of course when there is no acceptance then there is no contract.
The communication of revocation was held before the acceptance of the offer of the other party which agains says that the contract was not actually formed.
Hello!
I do not understand what you're trying to ask/say.
Do you have any answer choices or more words you might be missing?
