Maritza’s response supports school choice for personal freedoms and equal opportunity for all students to get the best education possible. The new information contradicts that position because it gives examples of charter schools that have failed and that are inferior to public schools. Maritza might consider the evidence strong enough to revise her position and rewrite the argument. She might also attempt to explain the evidence and defend her argument in a new paragraph by arguing that the benefits of school choice outweigh the disadvantages.
Explanation:
-The evidence contradicts Maritza’s existing position by challenging those ideas.
-The evidence is strong enough to require an explanation.
-The evidence might be convincing enough to cause Maritza to revise her argument and response.
Maritza’s response supports school choice for personal freedoms and equal opportunity for all students to get the best education possible. The new information contradicts that position because it gives examples of charter schools that have failed and that are inferior to public schools. Maritza might consider the evidence strong enough to revise her position and rewrite the argument. She might also attempt to explain the evidence and defend her argument in a new paragraph by arguing that the benefits of school choice outweigh the disadvantages.
All the Birlings commit crimes similar to the seven deadly sins. Mr Birling is greedy - he wants far more money. Sheila is guilt of wrath and envy as she complains about Eva Smith etc.
