Answer:
11,513
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Initial bacteria = 200
Growth rate r(t) = 
Now,
Total growth after 3 hours = 
or
Total growth after 3 hours = 
or
Total growth after 3 hours =![450.268[\frac{e^{1.12567t}}{1.12567}]^3_0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=450.268%5B%5Cfrac%7Be%5E%7B1.12567t%7D%7D%7B1.12567%7D%5D%5E3_0)
[ ∵ 
]
Thus,
Total growth after 3 hours = 400 × ![[{e^{1.12567t}]^3_0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%7Be%5E%7B1.12567t%7D%5D%5E3_0)
or
Total growth after 3 hours = 400 × ![[{e^{1.12567(3)}-e^{1.12567(0)}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%7Be%5E%7B1.12567%283%29%7D-e%5E%7B1.12567%280%29%7D%5D)
or
Total growth after 3 hours ≈ 11313
Hence,
Total bacteria after 3 hours = Initial bacteria + Total growth after 3 hours
= 200 + 11313
= 11,513
Answer:
D
Explanation:
If the price of corn is above its equilibrium price, corn becomes more expensive to consumers. As a result, they reduce the quantity demanded of corn. there would be a movement along the demand curve for corn and not a shift of the demand curve.
Quantity supplied would also increase as a result of the high price. The fall in quantity demanded coupled with the rise in quantity supplied would lead to a surplus. Due to the surplus, sellers would reduce price until price falls to equilibrium price
Answer:
D
Explanation:
motivation, desire, and attitude are the most important aspects when it comes to your job. Having your boss like you is great and all, but it won't get you a raise.
Answer:
<u> selling price at year 3:</u> $ 188.89
<u>at constant dollar year 3:</u> $ 167.94
Explanation:
selling price x accumualte raises:
selling price: 188,892
now, to calculate the constante dollar we discount for inflation:
constant dollar selling price: 167,9398271
Answer:
Expound, cajoled, inscrutable, acrimony, exult, harry, fluctuate
Explanation:
Word banks
Fill in the blanks using these words: fluctuate, cajole, expound, acrimony, exult, inscrutable, metier, and harry.
Councilwoman moore stepped up to the podium. "i don't think i need to expound upon reasons for voting against the proposed construction; i thought that the message was clear enough at the last meeting--when you all opposed it as well. obviously, someone has cajoled a few of you into changing your opinion since last month, and your sudden, inscrutable decision to yield to beta-rad enterprises bothers me a great deal. what happened to the surplus of acrimony toward beta-rad from the last meeting? don't you remember how we exult in our victory over the radioactive waste dump? for two years, we've listened to beta-rad executives harry us, and we finally had the chance to stop it for good. how could the opinions of fifteen people possibly fluctuate this much?"
word bank:
