1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sweet [91]
2 years ago
13

Replace the bold word with a matching

English
1 answer:
slamgirl [31]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:hell.

Explanation:

Seeds have hard shells.

You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes the theme of this excerpt in Liberalism and Socialism
Artist 52 [7]

Answer:

Socialists, who are they? and liberalism, what is it? I shall choose here to signify as socialist those thinkers and spokesmen who cannot be faulted as tender toward authoritarian regimes: I shall exclude Communists, Maoists, Castroites, as well as their hybrids, cousins, and reticent wooers. I shall assume that with regard to liberalism there has been some coherence of outlook among the various shades of socialist (and Marxist) opinion. But in talking about liberalism I shall be readier to acknowledge the complexities and confusions of historical actuality. And this for two reasons: first, that liberalism is our main interest today; and second, that since a surplus of variables can paralyze analysis (eight kinds of socialism matched against six of liberalism yield how many combinations/ confrontations?), I would justify taking one’s sights from a more-or-less fixed position as a way of grasping a range of shifting phenomena.

In the socialist literature, though not there alone, liberalism has taken on at least the following roles and meanings:

Especially in Europe, liberalism has signifed those movements and currents of opinion that arose toward the end of the 18th century, seeking to loosen the constraints traditional societies had imposed on the commercial classes and proposing modes of government in which the political and economic behavior of individuals would be subjected to a minimum of regulation. Social life came to be seen as a field in which an equilibrium of desired goods could be realized if individuals were left free to pursue their interests.1 This, roughly, is what liberalism has signified in Marxist literature, starting with Marx’s articles for the Rheinische Zeitung and extending through the polemics of Kautsky, Bernstein, and Luxemburg. In short: “classical” liberalism.

Both in Europe and America, liberalism has also been seen as a system of beliefs stressing such political freedoms as those specified in the U.S. Bill of Rights. Rising from the lowlands of interest to the highlands of value, this view of liberalism proposes a commitment to “formal” freedoms—speech, assembly, press, etc.—so that in principle, as sometimes in practice, liberalism need have no necessary connection with, or dependence upon, any particular way of organizing the economy.

Especially in 20th-century America but also in Europe, liberalism has come to signify movements of social reform seeking to “humanize” industrial-capitalist society, usually on the premise that this could be done sufficiently or satisfactorily without having to resort to radical/ socialist measures—in current shorthand: the welfare state. At its best, this social liberalism has also viewed itself as strictly committed to the political liberalism of #2 above.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which answer best completes the analogy?<br> toe:foot Answer:
4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

Lace: Shoe

Explanation: Hope this is correct

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A topic sentence must be followed by supporting evidence. <br> True <br> False
Crank
Answer: True

A topic sentence refers to the main idea of the paragraph. Usually, a topic sentence is found on the first line of the paragraph wherein it tells something about the entire content of the paragraph. The main idea of the paragraph or the topic sentence must be following by supporting evidence or statements. The topic sentence should be general and at the same time specific. It is general in the sense that it must be able to present the entire subject of the paragraph but specific enough to be understood by readers.

5 0
3 years ago
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
2 years ago
Read the excerpt from Part 1 of The Odyssey.
andriy [413]

ANSWER: Soldiers must be wary of their enemies.

EXPLANATION: The following excerpt shows that the soldiers were not obeying the orders and were busy in celebrating while the fugitives fled. The main force of Cicones was called to catch those fugitives back. The excerpt shows how irresponsible the soldiers were.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which option was used to revise this ​sentence? Dorian slept under the​ stars, and his dog lay beside him. As Dorian slept under
    10·2 answers
  • What can we infer about the Father’s shunning of his son in the story “Marriage is a Private Affair?”
    11·1 answer
  • In shakespeare's romeo and juliet, what is the relationship of romeo to mercutio?
    10·2 answers
  • PLSSS HELPPP!!! ILL MARK YOU BRAINLIEST PLSSS!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP THE ROUGH DRAFT WAS ON THE POEM "I TOO" I PASTED THE POEM BELOW BEST ANSWER GET BRAINLIEST
    6·1 answer
  • Schools today are all legally integrated; however, due to communities that are segregated based on cultural or financial reasons
    12·1 answer
  • The law of life , answer to 4 part b
    15·1 answer
  • What's a more formal way of writing “Sticks out the most”?
    6·2 answers
  • What made Frederick Douglas an
    9·2 answers
  • What is kairos? an appeal to the concept of time or place an appeal to emotions through details or examples an appeal to authori
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!