Answer:
The correct option is D,$41,200
Explanation:
The fact that inventory reduced by 1,400 units implies that the fixed costs of 1,400 units added to closing inventory under absorption costing method has now been released into income statement as an additional cost in the current year,as result profit under absorption costing method reduce by the increased fixed costs:
net operating income under variable costing $52,400
less:additional fixed costs (1,400*$8) ($11,200)
Profit under absorption costing method $41,200
The correct option is D,$41,200
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Answer: A, file a claim
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>
- Zack Slocum
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Answer:
The correct answer is: a new law that interferes with economic efficiency.
Explanation:
A production possibilities frontier shows all the points where production is efficient. The resources are being completely employed. The points above the frontier are unattainable. The points below the frontier are attainable but inefficient.
If there is a movement from the frontier to a point below it. This means inefficient allocation of resources. It can happen because of some law interfering in efficient allocation of resources.
Answer:
the approval was already anticipated by the market
Explanation:
This abnormal return of 0% suggests that the approval was already anticipated by the market. Meaning that the price of the Pharma company's stock had already been affected by the speculation previously and when the FDA made the announcement investors had already made their move in the market with regards to Pharma's stock. Thus causing no further move and a return of 0% to occur.
