Answer:
1. Quakers did not believe in fighting
2. Quakers settled in Pennsylvania
3. Quakers were treated harshly
Explanation:
Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion . . . or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press.”
1) Pay off the national debt at face value and have the federal government assume the war debts of the states. 2) Protect the young nations “infant” (new and developing) industries and collect adequate revenues at the same time by imposing high tariffs on imported goods. 3) Create a national bank for depositing government fund and printing banknotes that would provide the basis for a stable U.S. currency.
Answer:
The Clark's doll test study
Explanation:
Studies by Dr. Kenneth and Mamie Clark in the 1940s which was known as the doll test was cited by the Supreme Court in the decision which overturned separate but equal doctrine which was established in 1954 in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson.
The doll test was aimed at studying the psychological effect of segregation on African American children in which children between the ages of 3 to 7 were asked to identify the dolls they preferred and majority of them picked the white and attributed good qualities to it.
During the case between Brown and the Board of Education of Topeka, this experiment was cited by the Supreme Court in delivering their verdicts in favour of Brown prohibited segregation of black children in the education system.