1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Black_prince [1.1K]
3 years ago
9

Where can you find the notes of the meetings of Congress?

History
1 answer:
mina [271]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Congressional Record and its index may be available in large library systems or college libraries, frequently as a part of their participation in the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP). Over 1,100 libraries participate in the FDLP, collecting and/or providing public access to government documents.

You might be interested in
What prophet was sent by god to nineveh to preach repentance
Talja [164]
Jonah, (the whale was the only interesting part imo)
4 0
3 years ago
Individuals who opposed ratification of the constitution
erastovalidia [21]

anti-federalist

the character limit is stupid

6 0
3 years ago
List down 5 pros and 5 cons of having laws.<br><br><br><br> C.L.E
klemol [59]

Answer:

5,5

Explanation:

5 pros:

1)Uniformity and Certainty:

Law provides Uniformity and certainty to the administration of justice. The same law has to be applied in all cases. There can be no distinction between one case and another case if the facts are the same.

2)Protection against arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions:

If the administration of Justice is left completely to the individual discretion of a judge, improper motives and dishonest opinions could affect the distribution of justice. Law as Fixed Principles of the law of justice avoids the danger of arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions.

3)Freedom from errors of individual judgement:

The fixed principles of law protect the administration of justice from the errors of individual judgement. Commenting on this aspect of law, the Greek Philosopher Aristotle observed that "to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden." This, in other words, means that "law is not always necessarily wise but on the whole and in the long run it is wiser than those who administer it".

4)Reliability :

There is another advantage of law is its reliability. It is more reliable than the individual judgements of the Courts. The human mind is fallible and judges are no exception. The wisdom of the legislature which represents the wisdom of the people is safer and more reliable means of protection than the momentary fancy of the individual judge.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

5 cons:

1)The rigidity of law:

An Ideal legal system keeps on changing according to the changing needs of the people. But because of the rigidity of law, it is unable to keep pace with the fast-changing society. There is always a gap between the advancement of society and the legal system prevailing in it. The lack of flexibility in law results in hardship and injustice to the people.

2)Conservative Nature:

Another disadvantage of law is that its Conservative Nature. Law is conservative in its approach. The Bar and Bench are generally conservative in their approach to the dispensation of justice. The result is is that very often the law is static. This is not conducive to a progressive society.

3)Formalism:

The Law suffers from excessive formalism greater emphasis laid on the form of law rather than its substance. Undue formalism causes unnecessary delay in dispensation of justice.

4)Complexity :

Another disadvantage of law is its Complexity. It is true that every law effort is made to make law as simple as possible but it is not possible to make every law simple. That is due to the Complex nature of modern society.Commenting on the advantages and disadvantages of law Salmond observed that if the benefits of the law are great, the evils too are not small. Be that it may, it cannot be denied law serves as an effective instrument of social change. Law must change to the changing condition.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

3 0
2 years ago
Under the Constitution, who has the responsibility for relationships with foreign nations? The president can make treaties, but
DedPeter [7]
"The president can make treaties, but the Senate must ratify them" is the statement that shows the people having the responsibility in respect to foreign relations. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a". I hope the answer comes to your help.
6 0
3 years ago
Identify three documents on the timeline that are examples of social contract
Serggg [28]
So a social contract is where a "persons' moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live".
Rousseau was most famous for coming up with the term but examples have always existed and exist right now.

An example of how a social contract works would be the legal system. For augments sake, if I say you stole all my money and you deny it, instead of fighting it out with fists or me raiding your house to find it with a gun, we both put our faith in the legal system which we both agree will be more impartial, and get to the truth. I surrender my right to take matters into my own hands on the condition that you will also do the same. Why did we do this? Because there are more benefits than not having this system in place. I may not be able to get personal revenge on you for stealing my money but I also am protected from people doing the same to me. People who are born in a state metaphorically "sign" the contract when they are born in order to live in the state.

A primitive example if you want would be that two people meet in the woods looking for berries. Both have guns and are distrustful of the other. They are constantly looking over their shoulders at each other out of fear which prevents them from going about their berry gathering. Eventually they both agree to a "contract" that they will both give up their guns at the same time. They do this because whilst you do not want to give up your gun, it means that you don't have to worry about getting shot in the back so times are more productive.
The theory is the same even if people disagree on why social contracts exist. Folk like Rousseau thought that social contracts arose because at the end of the day, humans are more interested in personal liberty and life and wish to avoid conflict as much as possible. More pessimistic people like Hobbes thought it was because humans are so naturally warlike that we needed social contracts to prevent our own violent natures.
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did great Britain react to the rise of fascism before WW2
    8·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    10·1 answer
  • The Jesuits were part of a plan to win support for Protestant religions. True or False
    5·1 answer
  • 5.Why was Montezuma afraid of Cortes?​
    5·1 answer
  • The Prime Meridian is the imaginary line that is used to __________.
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following does NOT explain why Americans hoped to avoid involvement in the war in Europe?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was virginia's african american population so much larger than those of the other colonies?
    5·1 answer
  • Answer This correctly
    12·2 answers
  • How might taking an oath affect the choices a person makes?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of using specialized supply chain management software?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!